Jeffrey Toobin: Supreme Court could take gun legislation ‘off the table’


The Supreme Court is set to hear the first gun rights case in nearly a decade, and CNN's Chief Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin says the eventual ruling could have major consequences in the gun debate. #CNN #News

46 Comments on "Jeffrey Toobin: Supreme Court could take gun legislation ‘off the table’"

  1. Vannak RC Official | December 2, 2019 at 11:27 AM | Reply


  2. Well damn!!!

  3. International Harvester | December 2, 2019 at 11:31 AM | Reply

    State lawmakers acknowledge lobbyists helped craft their op-eds attacking Medicare-for-all – *WASHINGTON POST*

    • @DriveInFreak I know it’s hard for you to believe but, men and women come in many different shapes and sizes.

    • @DriveInFreak some men need a bigger stick then others. It’s not cowardly it’s getting to know who your better is.

    • rabid GOLEM lol, you distract from answering the comment. Your needing attention. Awe bless your heart. Your just trolling.
      For attention. 🙄🙄🥱🥱🥱😴😴😴😴😴 same chud material. 😴😴😴

    • @Kate Sweetblu awww bless, Your heart boomer. It appears your not familiar of how a comment section works. You see you just comment. For Enjoyment. 😅🤣😂

    • @Kate Sweetblu dont be such a debbie dopehead

  4. Skulls and bones. @winduskywalker

  5. Ram ranch#7😄😅😆😋😃😂lololol I’m loving it

  6. Comfort Country | December 2, 2019 at 12:00 PM | Reply

    Does he mean judges, some of whom are bought and paid for / blackmailed.

    • Which ones? Let me guess, all the ones you disagree with. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Silly dude, silly.

  7. Yeepy ky yay mfs. 😂

  8. This is the Land of PTSD not the land of the free

  9. Who’s ready for the boogaloo

  10. googlesucks you | December 2, 2019 at 2:16 PM | Reply

    Supreme court is a Supreme lie.

  11. The Supreme Court is bought and paid for!

  12. What a psychotic country, filled with children!

  13. I ain’t be got no wepup


    • Matthew Huszarik | December 2, 2019 at 7:39 PM | Reply

      Then let me build nuclear arms, anthrax biological arms, and sarin gas chemical arms. Constitution says arms not specifically fire arms.

    • @Matthew Huszarik Alright, go ahead. Governments are just nerds with law degrees. Why should they have a monopoly on nuclear force?

    • Marshall Boling | December 2, 2019 at 9:30 PM | Reply

      Matthew Huszarik all those are illegal underneath international law lol

    • Matthew Huszarik | December 2, 2019 at 9:48 PM | Reply

      Marshall Boling When international law conflicts with US law, US law is preeminent. So if Americans have a right to arms given them in the second amendment international law can not take that away. I am not advocating the right to any of those arms I am making a point that the founding fathers were saying Americans had a right to all arms thinking that entailed flintlock muskets and breech loading cannon they never envisioned modern weapon.

    • Marshall Boling | December 2, 2019 at 10:05 PM | Reply

      Technically you do have the right to own gas,bombs, grenades whatever the military owns per the constitution. It’s just if you were to use them it would be considered war against America and you would die. Now we don’t allow these things bc of the potential of mass death without prevention. You could make that same argument for the ar-15 but it is countered by any other weapon which majority of Americans should be carrying. You can’t counter a gas bomb or a actual bomb and protect yourself. That’s why it’s illegal to own them. When a gun gets to a point that it can’t be countered by another gun let me know. Guns are also really really really easy to make. Like fully automatic assault rifles. Not so easy to make a bomb or gas and not kill your self doing it lol

  15. ልውስጵፅ ቭዝጽፅ | December 2, 2019 at 5:02 PM | Reply


  16. That HARD ‘sigh’ right at the VERY end and you see the Libs heart SNAP in 2 when he hears that his way and his polls will not stop SCOTUS from voting in favor of the 2nd amd…LOL

  17. Cnn is bought & paid for!

  18. Jason Cavanaugh | December 2, 2019 at 10:05 PM | Reply

    When you can’t provide a legal position based on the Constitution on your TV show, use mass shooting alarm-ism instead!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.