28 comments

  1. The German Haubitzers have a longer range I believe and have been delievered. I hope the West keeps helping this awesome Nation.

    1. Russian is pioner on anti battery warfare so a portion of your Haubitzers are already destroyed.

    2. The USSR got into Afghanistan because of drug trafficking, to the Donbass because of shale gas, to Syria because of unaccounted for world gas, to Ukraine because of wheat and the Black Sea๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ“

    3. …….NATO …leaders..afraid ZELENSKEY, he is god …NATO..not….gesus../ zelznskey blaim to NAO …leardes../.after that….NATO…give …weapons..to war….there for…ukrain…people died………………….

  2. It can give Ukraine what we no longer use, but it has not lost its ability to kill.
    What is better to let it lie in the warehouse for another 20 years?
    For example self-propelled howitzers M-110? Or at least M-14 mines.

    1. And people were making fun of Russia for using old rusty Soviet tanks which was destroyed by Ukraine forces.

    1. @Dan Silverman The Russian Army has overrun Ukraine and Poland and is on its way to Lisbon, they just bypassed Kiev!

    2. The French ones are self-propelled so they will cost a lot more than the M777s. The M777s can be towed by a regular truck as they weight 9000lbs but they need to be setup/collapsed each time they are moved so that takes longer than the all in one French artillary. The M777s can also be dropped into hot zones by helicopters.

    3. The actually us army uses the SPA version of these very few units actually use the towed artillery anymore. Being able to set up and move and fire again is very important. That is why they are giving the Ukrainians the towed versions

  3. It’s pure insensitivity or care for the loss of life. A couple hundred guns doesn’t go very far when you’re trying to cover a couple thousand kilometers of border and front. The Ukrainians have been an example of how to get the most out of the least. Setting that example has cost way to many lives. I can’t understand if the guns are available why their not shipped. Given the right equipment in the right amount would see the orcs running for home with no chance of regrouping this side of their border in very short order. In three months how many lives would be saved on both sides.
    Sending it in bits and drabs is criminal when the Ukraine was promised a defense from aggression when they gave up their nukes. Do you think putin would be so outrageous if there were nukes on both sides of the border. The ones who made promises should get off the pot and live up to their word. Save some lives.

    1. The more the USA and Europe lisp with the putler, the more the more chances the putler gives๐ŸŽฑ๐ŸŽฑ๐ŸŽฑ

  4. And you think the Russians won’t multiple the 500 x 6? These people are firing close to 70,000 rounds a day across a 1500km frontline

  5. Ukraines best chance of making a good deal was before the war started, next chance was after Russian withdrawal from Kiev. Now is another opportunity to negotiate a ceasefire and a deal. Tomorrow the situation will be even worse. As some US military experts are saying there is no rational path for Ukraine to reverse what has happened. Germany, France too pushing for negotiation more than escalating the situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.