The 22-member Senate Judiciary Committee voted along party lines for an 11-11 tie, rather than offering a "favorable" or "unfavorable" recommendation.
RELATED: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson gets analyzed by law experts
Though the tie vote adds a procedural step, it won't stop Jackson's nomination from moving to the full Senate for consideration. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., can set the schedule for a full chamber vote, where Jackson is likely to be confirmed before Congress leaves for Easter recess at the end of the week.
» Subscribe to USA TODAY:
» Watch more on this and other topics from USA TODAY:
» USA TODAY delivers current local and national news, sports, entertainment, finance, technology, and more through award-winning journalism, photos, videos and VR.
‘Affirmative Action’ at its finest …..
@hydralizk why do you discriminate against Hispanics?
@TheRagingShiba I think he had every right to say that, especially after the last few years we’ve watched police kill black people, but nobody saying anything of any importance, so for him to say that was yeah important for his campaign but it meant alot to alot of people
A bit triggered there Johnny. But it’s youtube so we can go with it.
We’re going to get what we deserve with this absolute cowardly monster. What a circus, and that’s just so far. Congress constantly letting the voters down at wild expense.
yes
@Kevin Dunlap didn’t you just call her a cowardly monster?
CORRUPT AS THEY GET
i never heard of tie .. as a win ..?
my guess vice president broke the tie.
Its done by totalling up the combined IQ’s of those for versus those against.
I’d say something about the supreme court but I’m not a legal scholar.
I would speak but I’m not an English scholar I would have an opinion but I’m not a philosopher. I would stand for something but I’ve been told my entire life that my opinion doesn’t matter so I’m going to encourage other people not to stand up either!
I’m still googling who this person named Ties is and how they determined the vote. Journalism degree via mail order anyone ?
That must be why you haven’t made detective yet…… keep trying.
Churnalism
Just imagine 60 years ago MLK spoke about being judged by the content of your character,
60 years later we still pick and choose by the color of our skin 🙄 real progress
MLK is rolling in his grave.
@kpokpojiji LOL!!!!!
This is BS
$71,000 just in two weeks Expert Christine Norine Martin you are so amazing.
You’re wrong dude,Expect Christine Norine Martin is an expert trader on a certified broker, I’ve worked with her for years, everyone she processes he or her trade, is so lucky, all you have to do is believe in her and follow her guidance. Then sip your drink and relax
Thanks for the insight, I remember friends calling me crazy when I started investing in Bitcoin now! shut them up with my 4 figures weekly returns
Count me in because I’m placing my trades with Expert Christine Norine Martin ASAP.
I am from Charlotte, North-Carolina USA. I connected with her and she has helped me a lot,she makes so much profit for me she is a FINRA agent, the best I can invest with so far ever since I came in contact with Expert Christine Norine Martin my life has changed
^^^^^^^
the bots are getting stronger. THIS IS A SCAM
Choosing someone because of their *COLOR* or *SEX* is just *NEW RACISM AND PREJUDICE* .
Good thing she was voted in based on her intelligence and overqualification. Time to watch the Conservatards cry…
what we really need is a biologist
Anyone have a list of names who vote for her?
Kamala Harris wasn’t disaster enough of a token hire, so Biden is following it up with this beaut of a hire.
She’s too radical to be in supreme court.
explain how radical she is pls
@Hi Im James well for one… she doesn’t know what the definition of a women is
We have enough Conservatards on the Supreme Court. Time to vote somebody in with some brains.
Ketanji Jackson groped me at a party in the 1980s
Can anyone in this comment section site me a law that defines what a woman is and why it is even appropriate to ask someone to define it as a member of our judicial system?
We don’t need to her jackon
We don’t need to her jackon
Since when does a tie vote move ANYTHING forward in a legitimate committee????