The Supreme Court agreed to hear a dispute over redistricting in North Carolina, a case that could have major implications for voting rights across the country and fundamentally change the landscape of election law. CNN’s Laura Jarrett and Jeffrey Toobin discuss. #CNN #News
63 comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Recent Post
- Dominica: World Creole Music Festival Road Show in 2023
- Style experts spot a ‘no-no’ inside the Oval Office
- Amanpour: Dissent about war in Ukraine in Putin’s circle is ‘silenced’
- Cannes Film Festival 2023: The stand-out films and stars this year
- Anti-Putin Russians based in Ukraine allegedly stage incursion into Russia
Given the supreme court’s decision to allow states to control our body, it’s basically self-defense at this point.
@Daniel Manly Read your American history: you can start with Martin Luther King.
They gave babies a chance to live.
@J R You don’t want to make the argument? Anyone can come on YT and simply usher folks to “research on your own”…
@J R the civil war, notoriously nonviolent. 🤡
We already know how this gonna go
1 Mz Peachez Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
@Kristy Campbell No, fuq whatever YOU tryin to say. Comment in English
tasak
https://youtu.be/wnMjbZStEe8
I wish the us would take hints on how to do elections from Europe, holiday for voting or doing it on Sunday, mail in voting per request with no excuse with plenty of time ahead, free id for everybody. anything less than that is voter hinderance
@AdeptPaladin America has to allow you the same thing
@AdeptPaladin I’m simply saying we don’t have a pure democracy. I’m sorry that it went over your head.
@AdeptPaladin i’m not against mail in balloting or absentee balating for cause. What I’m against is mass mail in balloting and I’ve already explained my reasons why.
Umm, Our system is just France’s…
The US is rapidly going full Hunger Games 😕
We already were in the hunger games.
No it’s rapidly going to the 1950s
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
Why are they even taking the time to hear arguments when each justice has already made up their mind? Wonder how this will be decided?
Weakness of character seems to be the modern Right speciality tho
tasak 1
https://youtu.be/wnMjbZStEe8
I wonder what our new flag will look like.
They went from doing nothing to rushing everything through. Wonder why.
1 Leon Leon Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
The SC hears all their cases at the same time.
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
Criminal Court! 🤬
I guess you know more than the Supreme Court. Uh-huh.
Election Day should be a national holiday…
What’s the argument against that idea?
Actually asking…
@Reid Simonson Certainly! Working ONE Sunday in year is nothing. I currently work in a hospital.
The great thing about the US is the governments belief in humanity, law and, economics… unfortunately not in that order.
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
You can always leave. I hear Somalia loves the American left.
@Lesco Brandon Take omar, she can show you all the hot spots to visit.
Lot’s of things are happening fast. I have a bad feeling about this.
Last fight https://youtu.be/u244gu7o5ys
Let’s go Brandon
@Teutonic Nordwind You must live under a rock ..
It’s time for an American-style French Revolution.
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
Instigating bot
What side has all the firearms, controls all food production, energy production and has most of the former military and police on their side? Are you sure you want to see a revolution, really sure?
That literally would destroy the system of checks and balances.
Not really because theres always courts higher as well as congress , nobody in government has enough power
We’ll probably be like russia.
@BuffaloConfidential That’s why Trump won the popular vote both times, right? Er…oh wait.
@space witch that’s exactly what democrats did 🙄. Now there getting fixed
I would love to see the look on their faces if they passed voter ID requirements.
1 chavo 426 Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
“Their faces”? Who are you talking about?
@Phil A Buster the talking heads
He starts off so well, does he realize that changes to voting in PA wasn’t done by the state legislatures which is unconstitutional as ruled by PA’s state court.
1 Patrick Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
If state courts can’t strike down state laws (even partially), then the whole system of checks and balances go kablooey…
The state courts have no authority to change statewide election laws according to the constitution. The State’s legislature has to vote amongst themselves to change election laws . In this case the court abused its authority and overrided States legislative branch this has nothing to do with checks and balances.
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS BUDDY!
It doesn’t matter what the issue is; just ask yourself, “what would a demon want?” Hope you don’t believe in god or grandchildren.
Just another reason why I love living in Arizona. Best state in the country. Let’s go brandon!!
The founders intended that the legislators compromise and get laws passed.
It’s not a bad thing that one side can’t ram laws through or the executive branch can use its agencies to de facto make their own regulations.
The agencies should be in charge of enforcement of the laws … nit make the laws…
Your right, now if only democrats can learn that they can’t just ram stuff through
I am sure Toobin will be able to beat some sense out of this confusion.😂
Screw the Supreme Court.
I’m done being told what I can do