During their confirmation hearings, Supreme Court nominees called Roe precedent. Here's why their decision might have differed from their statements.
RELATED: Biden supports suspending filibuster to codify abortion rights | USA TODAY
» Subscribe to USA TODAY:
» Watch more on this and other topics from USA TODAY:
» USA TODAY delivers current local and national news, sports, entertainment, finance, technology, and more through award-winning journalism, photos, videos and VR.
#supremecourt #roevwade #ussenate
Oh, she’s got am agenda all right
Ruling in hell not serving in heaven and misery will be your guide. So far you have misery for women who do not have rights over their own bodies, you have misery for peacekeepers who don’t believe people should have concealed carry laws in their state (killing children in school), and you have misery for the environmentalists afraid of global warming will be handed down to their children. Children already have a song for it entitled “I love the way you hate me”. Rolling the dice with ex–casino owners made into President’s installing judges on the Supreme Court and it is anybody’s guess what more pain the future will unleash on the human spirit.
So eloquently and correctly stated. Thank you!
only against it if it’s done on an animal i’m not anti abortion or spay neuter or getting tubes tied and a vasectomy
Isn’t it ironic that the same people are against helping those babies after they’re born, who were born into poverty.
They lied under oath that’s what happened. Impeach them ASAP!
Are you crazy people kidding me. You are really reaching. They did their jobs and have made the right calls.