Sen. Klobuchar Explains Why She Could Be Up Against The Clock | Morning Joe | MSNBC

2020 Democratic candidate, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, weighs in on Thursday's debate in Los Angeles and the impact being in the Senate during Trump's impeachment trial could have on her campaign. Aired on 12/20/19.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Sen. Klobuchar Explains Why She Could Be Up Against The Clock | Morning Joe | MSNBC

42 comments

    1. @Tidbit It never ceases to amaze and disgust me how people choose to believe the most vile heinous rumors and lies about Hillary Clinton rather than the putrid nauseating truth facts about Donald Trump.

    2. Daniel Rivera “ A lie will jump out of bed and run around the world before the truth can put his pants on.” Mark Twain

    3. Someone help me understand. In this clip, the moderator said Sen. Warren would be the oldest president ever inaugurated but if Sen. Sanders and Vice President Biden are both older that her so how’s that possible? Was there something else said before that clip began that adds context because it appears that he may have been speaking before that portion of the clip started. I am going to watch the entire debate tomorrow. I haven’t had time to look at it today because of work and last minute Christmas shopping.

    4. @Beautiful Surprise They’d all be the oldest if they were inaugurated because they are all older than the record. If Warren were elected, neither Sanders or Biden could claim the the distinction because they weren’t elected. But if either one were to become president afterwards, THEN they’d be the oldest because they would have surpassed Warren.

    5. @His Bubbliness Oh, I get it. Duh. That makes sense. I wasn’t thinking about it in terms of the fact that if either of them won they’d each be the oldest because they are each older than anyone else who’s ever been elected. Lol. Yes it makes perfect sense now. Thanks.

  1. The oldwhite men and the women on the debate stage, in response to Obama’s comment, had great comebacks. We need some humor now days.

    1. centrist were what won Mi Pa Az Wi back in 2018 Hillary alone did not lose, by being a centrist she lost by all the backlash over emails,wiki,james comey,

    2. I’d love to see Sanders be the candidate. However, the division between centrist democrat and progressive democrats is going to end up screwing everyone. Any of these candidates are better than Trump and giving centrist a reason not to vote is as stupid progressives a reason not to vote. I am so tired of the “he’s too far left” but I’m equally tired of hearing progressives say “he’s too centrist that’s not exciting enough”…if getting Trump out of office not a big enough motivation I don’t know what is and right now it feels as if a lot of democrats are going to stay home and whine if their candidates don’t end up on the ticket.

    3. @Lanwarder people should know better for none presidential elections people voted centrist in 2018 both senate,governor in 2 key state Mi Pa no difference on a presidental level

    4. @Lanwarder can we just drop the labels (right, left, center, old, young, …etc…) for a minute and focus on the issues and the where the candidates stand? labels and categories are the tactics of the corporate interests that wish to perpetuate the injustices and inequalities of the status quo. it’s up to the people, you & me, to assert and claim our needs and our power, and we can do that by voting for the ones who represent US (as opposed to the corporations and the 1%).

    5. @Namaste Om And on that basis, Klobuchar is much much better than Sanders, as she can win and has realistic policy ideas that could be enacted.

  2. I will never support a candidate who abuses their staff.
    I don’t know who the Democratic candidate will be, but there are four people I will never vote for: Trump, Bloomberg, Gabbard, and Klobuchar the Hun.

  3. Unconcerned with Democrat winning landslide in 2020, more concerned about which Democrat wins. Klobuchar’s moderate stances haven’t really helped her break away or stand out from others in her political spectrum, or gain much ground on more progressive rivals. Find Amy qualified and personable, just not my favorite flavor. Prefer something bolder, a Warren, Yang, or Sanders. Very impressed with Julian Castro, and would take Booker over Klobuchar.

  4. As one other person pointed out in this thread, Sen. Klobuchar is “Trump-lite”. Politicians need to debate issues, ideas, policies, goals showing us what they know & what they will do if elected. I really hate the continuing use of argumentum ad hominem.

  5. For heavens sake stop trying to push Klobuchar down our throats. She has all the appeal of a week-old omelet. There’s a good reason why she can’t get above 2 or 3% in national polls.

    1. Really, I really like her and am tired of having freaks like Sanders and Yang shoved down my throat. Klobuchar is a breath of fresh air with he down-to-earth manner. And if she polled as low as you claim, she wouldn’t have been on the stage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.