Saying oil is dead is ‘disrespectful’: former Sask. premier

Parliamentary leader Elizabeth May and former Sask. premier Brad Wall debate the state of the oil sector and what the industry could look like.

Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:

Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:
CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on Twitter:
Watch CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Google+:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Pinterest:


CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

36 comments

  1. Excuse me, Mr. Blanchet, but … If ʹoil is deadʹ, what about coal and petroleum coke – of which your new cement plants, given a pass by the Trudeau government without environmental regulation – heavily relies? Because, perhaps you were not aware, but the cement industry emits more carbon dioxide than the worldʹs crude oil production. According to Stanford University (Aug 30 2018) ։ ʺin 2015, nearly 9,000 oilfields in 90 countries produced greenhouse gases equivalent to 1.7 gigatons,ʺ where 1.7 gigatons = 1.7 billion tonnes. Yet, from The Guardian (Feb 25 2019) ։ ʺIf the cement industry were a country, it would be the third largest carbon dioxide emitter in the world with up to 2.8 bn tonnes, surpassed only by China and the US.ʺ In other words, the manufacture of concrete creates 65% more emissions than the global production of crude oil. Besides, last I checked, concrete does not exactly pay this country′s bills, let alone Quebec′s.

    Furthermore, because *wind power uses more than 32ⅹ the amount of concrete as natural gas for each MW of energy generation* (870 cubic metres vs. 27 cubic metres), which necessitates coal – that emits 31% more carbon dioxide than oil and 70% more than natural gas for each unit of energy – then, aside from the obvious drawbacks of intermittency and the giant expanse of land required, just how is renewable energy going to be the earthʹs saviour?

    Source (copy + paste, remove the space) ։ theguardian. com/cities/2019/feb/25/concrete-the-most-destructive-material-on-earth

  2. I think may should start living 100 percent without fossil fuels immediately see how she lives then walk to Ottawa

  3. A woman who is stepping down from a party with her two seats ,why give her such a platform for her crazy ideas .?

  4. Look at May she has eyeglasses earphones clothing artwork heated painted home/office cellphone computers everything we use wouldn’t happen without petroleum …..

    1. broadstbulldog66 if you like the way you’ve been living for the paste 2 months then vote green as this will be the green reality if they had their way.

  5. Evan why do you not ask her the really hard questions i.e. how does she fly to Ottawa, drive her car, heat her home? Seriously how brain dead can you be. Some legacy she is leaving for her children. Ugh

  6. I will never understand why everyone in Canada would not want to use our own resource, why can we not be oil rich? I DON’T GET IT!😭👀😭

    1. Canada can’t be oil rich because oil sands oil for the forseeable future is far too expensive to extract and far too expensive to transport.

    2. Trevor Pickersgill, SIT DOWN because to anyone informed on the Oil&Gas Industry like myself, your comment is just dumb..

  7. I don’t know when my politicians got dosed and became a bunch of touchy feely hippies.. but I hate it.. can we get back to reality please?

  8. The largest Canadian export is oil & gas. 80% of the World’s oil is controlled by eight countries and we are number three. The second largest export is auto & auto parts; auto industry is down some 86%. Want to end oil & gas? Welcome to poverty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.