The Prime Minister also said that he intends to respond to the IC.
The concerns, not criticisms, expressed by the Prime Minister were not directed at the membership or institution. They was directed on the bases of or reasons for the ruling on which he had been earlier advised. Unlike those that have savaged the IC its chairman and other members, all that the Prime Minister did was express himself on the matters which he read and on which he was advised, a right reserved to all, on his concerns while at the same time saying he intended to deal with the matter. Is there something wrong with that or would it have been better if he had conducted the type of savage onslaught on the IC as we have witnessed from the Q 95s, Patriots, the Cabalists and Workers alike?
BTW, have you read the IC ruling?
