69 comments

  1. Since they’re basing their actions on their ‘feelings’, not evidence, I think they should be prosecuted.

    1. @Save 🇺🇸 of course I’m making stuff up…🤦🏻‍♂️
      You’re not watching the hearings, am I right?
      Well, watch the previous three hearings and you’ll find out if I’m making stuff up.🤦🏻‍♂️

    1. @TT the same one you always go to ? Wow , that’s the gayest place in the world! Good for you and your boyfriend!

    2. @Vital Signs 👈🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤣🤣🤣

  2. This man is such a disgrace, what honor & dignity he is talking about. Pushing Lies upon Lies is his defense. Just freaking nuts.

  3. They re voted 2 to 1 to certify, Griffin voted no. He asked to be put in jail so I hope they call his bluff.

  4. Once a final judgment is rendered, Mr. Griffin can be held in civil contempt of court until he complies. As he holds “the keys to the jail,” he can be jailed indefinitely until he complies. A lawyer once served 14 years for civil contempt. If Mr. Griffin believes what he is saying, he should welcome serving 14 years for civil contempt. The judiciary needs to draw clear lines and enforce its orders.

    1. @Noneshere You can, in fact, force a government actor to do so. This is absolutely 100% necessary for the government to be held accountable against internal corruption. You remove the ability for the courts to compel government actors and you remove every check and balance against government overstepping from the system entirely.

    2. For Anyone who doesn’t know, please don’t click these random links that day things like “finally, it’s here!” They are usually either unrelated videos from someone trying to monetize,but they can also be scam links or phishing links. Just report them as spam.

  5. Too bad the laws don’t require 10 year minimum for election related crimes committed by officials, such as this felon.

    1. Why is committing felonies not a disqualifyer for those trying to get into the government? Do we not require ethics standards?

    2. @C C Because then it becomes incredibly easy to simply jail your opponents to eliminate them and hold onto power. Use your head.

  6. He is publicly demonstrating his stupidity in his vain attempt to proclaim his superiority over a process he is unqualified for and swore an oath to uphold🤦‍♀️

    Welcome to amurica😞

  7. I’m from New Mexico and I’m honestly disgusted to know someone like those 3 commissioners are in charge of anything

    1. @MasterMan 126 I hear you… With these sort of people in control of ANYTHING is A CRYING MATTER..
      THERE IS NOTHING FUNNY (HA HA)
      about this or them.

  8. Using this guy’s logic, a judge can decide he’s guilty (or anyone else) of a crime by saying “I have no evidence you committed a crime but I’m sentencing you to five years in prison based my gut feeling and intuition you did. And that’s all I need.”

    1. Dominion should sue this guy too. Because again, one of the excuses he used had to do with his accusation that the dominion machines are somehow inaccurate.

  9. Exactly the reason why the prosecution shouldn’t have been so lenient. If you were involved with the Jan 6 insurrection riot at any level you should be deemed ineligible to hold a position in the government at any level.

    1. That’s what the constitution says anyone that assists or do an insurrection deems ineligible

    2. Thank you! This is what I have been saying to anyone who will listen. I’m amazed at how many people overlook this issue. If you were there on January 6, you have committed a crime, and you are not eligible.

  10. This is why it’s so important to make an example of Donald Trump and any other GOP individuals that knowingly broke elections law!!

  11. Refusing to do your legal duty because of ideology should be grounds for dismissal and prosecution. How this is allowed is beyond me.
    Edit: Ideology is not the correct word. Zealotry, Insanity, sycophantic behavior. Those fit better.

    1. @ LOUISE JOHNSON yet, for two replies you asked who…
      “who is this comment directed at? It doesn’t seem to fit the OC’s comment, but it’s not addressed to anybody else.”
      “who are you asking this of?”
      methinks you are just trolling for attention

    1. @Upper 90 please stop adding such intelligent banter to conversations… 🙄😂 Few stones short, aren’t ya?

  12. If this guy spends ten years in prison and is so heavily fined that upon release he remains indigent until his dying day, this s**t will stop immediately. If they are allowed to proceed without consequences it will grow and fester until it is too late to reverse it without massive bloodshed. Let’s hope that we’ve not already crossed that point.

  13. These are THE WORST “people “ ever! The funny thing is that they think they are soooo righteous!

    1. What’s with the quotation marks? Are you trying to dehumanize people who disagree with you? Well, aren’t you a gem.

  14. Anyone else on probation would have already been violated for the refusal to follow the law. Buy because this guy is a politician he gets away with it. I’m so sick of 2 sets of standards in this country.

  15. Judges should be held accountable for letting them out of jail and not enforcing terms of release instantly.

  16. This is why letting them plead lesser charges and not pushing the felonies they committed lead to future problems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.