Meghan And Harry Tell-All In Shocking Interview With Oprah | Morning Joe | MSNBC

In a wide-ranging Sunday interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry revealed a troubling allegation about the royal family's views about race. Aired on 03/8/2021.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

About Morning Joe with Joe Scarborough: Join Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, and Willie Geist, for in-depth and informed discussions that help drive the day's political conversation. Top newsmakers, Washington insiders, journalists, and cultural influencers, come together on Morning Joe for unparalleled insight and analysis around the day's biggest stories.

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

#Meghan #Harry #MSNBC

Meghan And Harry Tell-All In Shocking Interview With Oprah | Morning Joe | MSNBC

95 comments

    1. @Maria Hewitt ; just “ skin cancer “ so many type of cancer , the SUN gives only one . Meghan is born with a natural tan , all year around , they just jealous, they wish they had that tan .

    2. @Gwendolyn Williams yeah who gives any F’s what Meghan’s expectations were. She should have treated like a human being regardless what illusions she was under at the time she joined.

  1. The one drop rule is a trip. They looked at Meghan, and still thought Archie was gone look like Bernie Mac.

    1. @SING UNTO THE LORD Inspired by the holy spirit
      Archie will be treated like Harry while his Mom will continue to get the princess Diana maltreatment

  2. This is the third young girl now that married in to that family and had trouble adjusting to life at the palace

    1. This isn’t simply a matter of “adjusting to palace life”. You can’t “adjust” to accepting racism. Think about what you’re saying next time.

    2. @Fred A What “racism”? Meghan and Harry’s stories are obvious BS. The only person in this who appears to be actually racist is Meghan herself. It would be nice if she finally is prepared to identify as Black now – she never has before.

    3. Of course. The royals have a far more difficult job than many give them credit for.
      But at least Diana and Fergie didn’t make up such obvious BS in an attempt to cash in on the royal family’s fame.

  3. When someone says ‘We all we’ve been through’ it seems like no one really want to put an end to that toxic behavior.

    1. The only one who wanted to put an end to it was Harry! That’s why he got her out of there before history repeated itself!

    1. If they really dig Meghan will be mentioned at Prince Andrews interview. Don’t forget Meghan is one of Epstein yatch girl.

    2. Meghan, had no intention of staying
      in Canada. The Z grade actress had
      all intentions of moving to Hollywood.

  4. Two Brit youtubers got “Royal Pundits” to give reviews of the interview, 36 hours before they saw it!

    1. If i was those royal reporters, i’ll just ‘fess up & apologise! but oh no no no they are making excuses, calling Josh & Archie who interviewed them scammers! And the most annoying thing is that they even got paid 😡!! Imagine the whole 4 years Meghan was with Harry how much money these fools made out of the young royals!

    2. Yup, I watched that vid – it was disgusting. I will never again watch Royal Experts giving their opinion. They lost all credibility in that moment.

    3. Haven’t seen,but heard about it…..”experts”,who knew they were giving views BEFORE having seen the programme……WHAT LIARS,WHAT HYPOCRITES ! HOW TYPICAL !

  5. It must have been so hard for them both. Would not trust any of them around Archie including staff! Its easy to make something look like a accident.

    1. History has repeated itself with one twist – Harry is old enough to remember what happened to his mom and he made sure it didn’t happen to his wife. That takes b*lls of steel. Much respect. After hearing what Harry and Meghan went through, I realize it takes courage and guts to walk away.

    1. @Zachary Riley How is it going to do that? Just because its parents make an obviously BS claim that its skin color was an issue? That’s not going to impress anyone who actually knows the facts about the monarchy and the titles babies are given – did Meghan really think she could fool people about this?

    2. @Mike M Yeah and the small detail that the crown, the Queen, and no one in the entire royal family has disputed or refuted that claim. They won’t even deny it. Buy you go right ahead and pick up that cross and carry it by yourself.

    3. @Zachary Riley Yeah and the small detail that Meghan and Harry won’t give any detail to allow anyone to dispute or refute the claim. That’s their obvious reason for refusing to say who the person was. But you go right ahead and pick up that cross and carry it by yourself.

    1. Definitely a baby is precious. And the royals knew who said it it’s a family who stand to loose if anything goes wrong with William. Harry is next in line to the throne think about the logic

    2. Milk and Spice don’t they realize the king who ruled hundreds of generations ago was black. They better check their history. You know Michael Strahan Of 39 great great thirtyninth great grandfather was king

    3. @Bernice Ocasio Since Harry and Meghan won’t say who is alleged to have said it, the story can be dismissed as BS – just Meghan and Harry trying to create some publicity. BTW, Harry isn’t next in line after William – George, Charlotte and Louis all come before Harry.

    4. Mike M but if George is next in line if William is no more and his son is say 10. Would he be able to become king at ten just curious

    5. @Bernice Ocasio Sure. You are talking about a scenario where the Queen, Prince Charles, and Prince William all die within the next three years. Not likely, but it is possible. George then becomes the heir to the throne at age 10. Parliament must appoint a Regent to fulfil duties in his name until he turns 18. If you want me to guess who Parliament might choose as regent, my best guess would be either Prince Edward or his wife Sophie Countess of Wessex. Both are sensible, uncontroversial and know royal protocol. Once George turns 18, he becomes King and there is no further requirement for a regent.

  6. O.o THIS is an interesting “News” story???? I thought we would have had survived all this boulevard press stuff …and now they start it again? Family quarrels with royalty glamour o/ Exactly what we all need now! *head shaking*

    1. Agree. Blah blah. So many really important matters to hear about around the globe,than this bull crap.

    1. Exactly, even though princess Diana was white the fact is she didn’t measure up to their standard, one of my observation with Diana even though her parents wasn’t wealthy if she was in the blood line of the royalties I think they would accepted her.
      I’d encourage anyone to read this book about the woman who is not impressed it’s about the life of queen Elizabeth.

    2. Of course, since this whole interview appears to be BS. Meghan is trying to copy Diana, but she is nothing like her.
      But what else can Harry and Meghan do but sell smears and lies to the US celebrity media? They have no other way of earning a living.

    3. So true. The Monarchy love her son and his outer half. Cause Diana was getting all the attention and not camila she was part of their plan

    1. It’s tough living in a home where your brother and sister warn everyone against you and you treat your dad like a pile of crap! Of course she’s unwanted, she’s unwanted everywhere she goes.

    2. @Bubbly Sunshine Complaints against Meghan of bullying staff are not new. Some of them go back more than a year. There were more than a dozen of them. But the adoring US media didn’t want to know, because the staff aren’t “celebrities”. Worship of celebrities in USA is extreme, and Meghan understands this. Attacking the royal family is a sure path to success for her.

    3. @Rebecca Arthur The “other side” is referring to the many lies and smears told by Meghan and Harry, as well as Meghan’s bullying of those weaker than her. Meghan had a dream run from the press in Britain. She was very popular, until people began to learn what she is really like.

  7. Shades of Edward who gave up the throne for “the woman I love.” Good show, Harry! Good show Megan! You are entitled to your happiness with your kids.

    1. @E C staying with the creepy royal family is not healthy for Archie and his still to be born sister.

    1. I haven’t seen the full interview, but this one quote is gonna be blown out of context in the public forum. Discussing the baby’s skin colour should be no different to dicussing who the baby will look like the most, or what colour hair it will have, or the shape of the nose, or the eye colour. These are normal discussions people have before the child is born.

      However, having built up a bigger picture without having seen the full interview, there’s more to this story than the everyday conversations many couples and their families have regarding the birth of a new baby.

    2. Maybe they should reveal the context and what was said before demoliting peoples reputations. It’s easy to throw accusation after accusation with no proof, knowing that the institution will never reply. Never complain never explain.

      Honestly my ex was mixed and we used to speak about what our children may look like, if they’d have his skin and my eyes or which side of the family they may take after. It’s curiosity, even excitement. It doesn’t make it racist.

    3. If its even true. There is a lot of obvious BS in the interview. By not naming the “baby skin color” person, they can smear the entire royal family, while denying that person any opporutnity to tell their side of the story, or even to deny it completely. This is just chasing publicity.

    1. people tend to forget that they have no stake in this dog fight, harry is still royalty he will go back and reconcile with his family, your talking sense

    1. Yes! Exactly! That is one of the statements that’s are being mulled over here in the UK. The general opinion here is that certain things just don’t add up. Eg: Harry would have known that until Charles becomes king Archie doesn’t get a title. But this will happen automatically when Charles does. Also as a working royal, with a generous allowance Harry would have had more than enough money to pay privately for Archie & Megan’s security. With the Queen, Charles, and William its duty duty duty. Charles and William would not have thought a great deal of Harry to just give it up. (But the Brits understand how deeply he has fallen in love with Megan.)They have all gone through truly awful times at the hands of our merciless press. In fact Catherine has had really hurtful things written about her (not just waity Katie) the press have criticised her mother, sister & brother. She’s been called a doormat, a woman with no voice etc etc All of this is wrong. Bcos Catherine is in fact a very intelligent & strong woman. Their job as royals is to be a consistent force in our lives & a comfort to everyone. No matter what We much prefer the Royals to a presidency. But I suspect until William is king things will remain rocky for the royals. The difference with William is not just because of Diana but he & Catherine have a marriage that will stand the test of time & up against such vitriol people will respect that. (The racist issue was most prob a extremely tactless remark.. I don’t think we have to be rocket scientist to hazard a guess who would say that). I think Megan is very beautiful (as is Catherine) with Megan as mum & handsome Harry as dad can you imagine how good looking their children will be!🥰

    2. @He Reigns IF a racist remark WAS made.
      We only have a B list actress and an ex-Royal looking for celebrity, making this very vague allegation. After everything they have tried before, ‘having no part in the book’ etc I don’t trust them.

    3. @Shabby Balls What a lowlife troll you are. But then, you always have been, and you are also a “has been”

    4. @John Newbold Why is he trolling? Many people are asking the same questions. Like “We got married three days before” – not legally they didn’t. “The royal family didn’t support us against the media” – Several people have already contradicted them on that. And there are plenty more questions.

  8. Thinking the “Royals” might focus on their “Randy Andy”
    His actions…historical predatory behaviors are so much worse than anything Megan & Harry are doing.

    1. @Bluebel Blue I doubt this will go any further. The palace will investigate so it doesn’t happen again. It’s not like it could go to court, Megan is repeating what Harry said, so it could be classed as heresay. No that I’m doubting it was said anyone of them could have said it, even Harry has been know to be controversial in the past. We me never know who it was. Got my suspicions though.

    2. @Loretta Moulpied Sure, I have my suspicions too, but like you, I don’t voice my speculations here – because that’s all they are, speculations? As you say, we may never know…

    3. So far the only real allegation against Andy is that he slept with a 17 year old in the US Virgin Islands, where the age of consent is 18. No evidence that he was aware of her age, nor aware that the age of consent was different to Britain (16). Anyway, complain to the person who wrote this article – its not about Andy.

    4. @Bluebel Blue That appears to be Harry and Meghan’s intention. The obvious reason for not naming names is so that nobody can contradict them or give a different view. But its a great way to smear the entire royal family…

    5. @Mike M
      Ahhh yes🧐
      Poor old chap.
      Defend a 50-60 year old’s sexual perversions.
      The girls being young Teenagers.

  9. If history has taught us anything, Anglo Saxon traditional sentiments include racism. Have done for eons of time.

    1. So blacks get all raged up about a white lady yrs ago heading a NAACP chapter in Wash st BUT expect White English peeps to not care about the bloodline of a 1000 plus yr old nation changing?— God are blacks and Oprah RAGING FUCKN BIGOTS..

    2. @Rants in a Robe not because she headed it, because she lied and lied and lied and lied about everything. Don’t conveniently forget that part. You’re welcome!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.