A source close to Justice Clarence Thomas says he plans to amend his disclosure forms to acknowledge a 2014 land deal with a GOP megadonor. CNN's Brian Todd has more. #CNN #News
‘Kind of pathetic’: Advocate calls out Supreme Court justice’s defense
61 comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Post
-
-
-
-
-
Not accountable to THE CITIZENS. Not to mention a strong sense of ENTITLEMENT
@Dustin Caso, Minor error?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Dustin Caso because he did it over and over. you try that story when the IRS audits you. see how far you get with that!
@Fair Dinkum hahaha!
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
Republican megadonor Harlan Crow has claimed Justice Thomas never asked for any of the “hospitality gifts” provided to him. But, whether Thomas asked for annual gifts, worth hundreds of thousands, or not, he still failed to declare them and the proceeds from the sale of several properties.
However, it begs the question if said gifts were as innocent as suggested why continually and actively make an effort to hide them. Thomas’ own actions, or rather lack of, substantiate an awareness on his part that the gifts, he never asked for, are not as innocent as he’s undoubtedly hoping will be believed.
What should be a greater priority is that a Justice of the highest court in the land has displayed considerable dishonesty over decades, in both what he does and how he does it. How is it reasonable for him to hold a position judging others.?
Its questionable how anyone might now think Thomas,’ or anyone else’s, personal choices wouldn’t affect how they do their job. It is inevitable that everything we do, whether personal or professional, will always affect everything else. And, now the public perception that Thomas lacks good judgement and honesty will always bring into question the decisions he makes as a Justice.
Thomas’ wife’s activities leading to January 6 or himself being viewed as “key,” by Trump lawyers, in delaying Congress’ certification of Biden’s victory in 2020, and extreme luxury vacations provided by a Republican mega donor can’t not perpetuate an awareness that Thomas can be bought.
Can it really be okay for a Justice on the highest court in the nation to be thought as potentially untrustworthy at any time for any reason. Now, current reports about Thomas virtually guarantee an even bigger discussion that includes Anita Hill’s 1991 testimony regarding previous questionable actions.
An asterisks next to the name of a Supreme Court Justice highlighting accusations of sexual harassment and millions of dollars in “hospitality” gifts is forever a part of the nation’s history. Thomas has really only ever faced questions of whether he did or didn’t do something but maybe now, given his position, actual consequences for his dishonesty should be considered.
** “Hospitality gifts” is undoubtedly how Thomas’ presence will be described when said gifts are claimed as a business expense against Crow’s taxes.
That was a weird way of saying you have no clue what your talking about😉
mr and mrs johnson, clearly you struggle with reading comprehension. May I suggest you start with One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish Corruption and work your way into See Ginny Steal, then when a bit more capable you give the definition of “Ethics” a go.
I mean does anyone truly believe if Harlan Crow ever had a case brought before the Supreme Court that he wouldn’t threaten to take away Thomas’s mothers home if he didn’t vote in his favor.
Or free rent!!!
Citizens United. To keep the money flowing in secret.
@jski: Your thinking is a little childish.
@Jared Burgess kinda off the subject, but I must say how kind and concerned our Aussie friends have been through all of this. I can’t imagine what we did to deserve your kindness. maybe someday our people will be even half as decent as yours. and thank you.
@Really?!CITIZENS UNITED. That’s the case that came before Thomas. The right to bribe Thomas in secret. I can not see a childish observation in Jski’s comment. Other than the innocent belief that this relationship might be innocent, but Citizens United would argue against that.
Any judge should understand the meaning of bribery.
The appearance thereof.
@RICHARD HOLGUIN Really not banking receipts…lol
@Belly Dancer Em that doesn’t happen, it’s stupid.
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
You can’t rewrite your returns! If you could, everyone would do it! And besides, you don’t need ‘advice’, you’re a Supreme Court judge man, pull yourself together! Ignorance of the law is no defense.
He is a Supreme court Justice. He is above the law.
I wonder how many people he’s told that to people. Ignorance of the law is no defense”?
Well you certainly can. At least up to a certain number of years. It’s called an amended return.
one can file amended returns, in case you missed that class.
Now imagine the GOP response if Thomas were a democrat.
RABLE, RABLE RABLE!
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
He lied to get on the court and he has lied ever since.
You are absolutely right. I was around when he was being selected for the court. Anita Hill told the truth while Thomas lied.
😂no he did not do Research please
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
@Seek The Truth go away
half a million $$ of pampering is not a gift, he knows and we all know, supreme judge corruption at its best
When the lawmakers are the lawbreakers…
Here is the thing ? imagine it being a democratic justice , the GOP would be all over this like a severe rash !
What next mountain Dweller ? Lynching and Hanging…
If he were democrat you loons would be screeching “RACISM!” for dare questioning him
DOJ ,IRS and any other agency having oversight should conduct a thorough investigation.
If you can’t follow the rules of financial disclosure, it sort of raises questions about your ability to be a Supreme Court Judge.
@V P They were Old Maiden type of shoes
You think!
Things that the higher-ups can get away with…Amazing
@Gay patterson your whataboutism is boring.
Really disgusting. He really feels he is superior, entitled and that the rules don’t apply…..and I don’t think he’s the only one.
And on top of that he blames it on his subordinates.
Sounds like most managers that have subordinates!
Sounds like you’ve Described the GOP Repubs. NO RULES TO FOLLOW FOR THEM , BUT OTHERS MUST FOLLOW !!
Most a criminals have that personal sense of entitlement. I
It’s a hallmark of the criminal personality.
It’s literally the definition of using their office to enrich themselves
Agreed 100%. You cannot use a better example to define what a corrupt judge looks like.
They aren’t mistakes. They are purposeful omissions.
Also known as selective memory failure happens a lot when you are over the hill
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
DOJ has to step in and prosecute Clarens Thomas.
He should resign immediatly. Period.
If he thinks he did nothing wrong, he is not qualified to be a judge anywhere.
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
The Supreme Court has no true accountability.. That has to change
Imagine the law being too difficult to comprehend by a Supreme Court Justice.
Needs to hire a assistant to spell the rules out in crayon for him.
Ikr??
Peace B2U💐
You Are Invited to The Religion of ISLAAM Did you know that our real life begins in afterlife? This life is a temporary test from our lord
This judge knows EXACTLY what he’s doing. It’s not “kind of” pathetic, it IS pathetic AND illegal. How is it that a judge sitting on the top court can skirt laws on real estate property, not report $$$$ in gifts and still say he is a moral authority or anything NEAR that? He’s a crook in my book and needs to step down.