Internal Document Suggests Pence Role In Trump Ukraine Scandal | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

Rachel Maddow notes that among new evidence that has come to light since Donald Trump's impeachment is a letter from a DOD official who seems to think Mike Pence meeting with the president of Ukraine would resolve the hold Donald Trump had put on military aid, suggesting Pence had a role brokering Trump's quid pro quo. Aired on 01/06/20.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Internal Document Suggests Pence Role In Trump Ukraine Scandal | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

53 comments

    1. @Mind Freshener Do you have any proof that she was given her degree? Or that she’s transgender?
      I think it’s shameful and deplorable when a man feels its his right to denigrate a woman for any reason. But I guess that’s what happens when you elect someone who openly mocks the disabled, bullies little girls with mental health issues, sexually assults women, and steals from his own charity.
      If you don’t like her, fine. But you focusing on who she sleeps with or disparaging her IQ because you don’t like her politics should be beneath you.

    2. @Tonya Sweeney Where did I say that he is “transgender”?? He is just an ordinary cross-dresser. Not very original, and plenty of guys who want to get on the LGBT Gravy Train and still keep their balls intact, do it. Please learn to navigate your own maze of Liberal Gender Confusion.

      If you care about women, you should fight to rid the MSM Industry from cross-dressing men who take their jobs.

    1. Maddow told her viewers for two years Trump couldn’t get the nomination, then couldn’t get elected, then two more he would be removed after the Mueller investigations, now she shifts to this. Amazing she still has a tiny audience.

    2. Watching everyone point fingers at each other and deem the other a troll is really hilarious.. 🍿🍿🍿 please don’t stop

    3. I feel racism to the Russian laugh culture, this is a phenomenon of the cultural life of a great people, show respect

  1. And to think all this trolling is from one dude with 20 accounts. Makes him look important. What’s hilarious is that nothing he posts here will make a difference. But he’s so naive about the internet, he believes that he matters.

    1. Should Trump be removed and Pence installed to complete the term, the House has enough on Pence to bring Articles of Impeachment against him. Yep, he’s gonna bite the dust too!

  2. I was expecting the magas to break records enlisting for army service.
    C”mon ” patriots” fight for u r leader.

    1. @Rafiki Cohen is not Trump is he. There was zero connection between Cohen’s illegal activity and Trump so again you guys are being dishonest with your connections. Did Diane Feinstein get charged for having a Chinese Spy on her payroll for nearly 20 years? No because they did not find a direct connection between her and the spy in illegal activity. Cohen was charged for crimes that were not even related to his employment of Trump as a lawyer. You know how stupid it is to try to say Trump is guilty just because one of his Lawyers was a dishonest person. We have all had people in our lives who have been charged with crimes that surprise us. It doesn’t mean we are guilty of the same crime just because they are our associate or employee. Have you ever thought how many Lawyers Trump has had on staff at all times throughout his life? His business’ employ over 20,000 people and has a ton of attorneys on staff at all times so that accusation was very deceptive. Cohen was found to be a habitual liar and dishonest character yet you guys all believe him when he is trying to make up crimes against Trump without proof to lesson his sentence. The funny part is if he wasn’t Trump’s lawyer he would never have been charged with any crimes because he would never have been investigated. Democrats for 3 years have been digging as deep as possible to find any crime against Trump and so far have found nothing. Even their impeachment was a sham that had bipartisan vote against it and only partisan vote for it.

      I just hope you keep an open mind because association is not a crime or most of Hollywood would be in prison now for their close ties with a pedophile.

    2. @Rafiki Name the 8 felons and how were the charged offenses linked to Trump? How about the 25+ people in the FBI, CIA, and DNC’s associates that were linked to the Russian dossier that were either charged, fired or demoted for their part in the Russian hoax? Do they all mean Obama was a criminal because the illegal activity happened while he was the President? We can all make a lot of assumptions but when the facts and evidence don’t link the various charges back to either president we cannot ethically accuse them of a crime.

  3. Rachel gets all the russian beta males all bent out of shape, LOL…They’re practically in hysterics ranting and crying!

    1. The anti Russian hysteria is risible. It’s not Russia that’s the cause of Americas failure. It’s not Mexico either, or Iran or Iraq or China or Afghanistan or Syria or NATO or Canada or the EU or Vietnam or N Korea. One day American’s will look in the mirror and Lo! there, looking back, will be the reason.

    2. @skirmisher front Name one time Rachel Maddow has been ‘made to retract”. ONE. I have heard her voluntarily admit she’s made a mistake – maybe once. Compare that to Faux news who lies constantly and NEVER EVER retracts. get your fact straight. Pravda!

  4. Thanks Rachel.
    These🤪 folks mad and calling Rachel a liar. But they still watching her🤣🤣🤣🤣

    1. @Mark Madison – At least the increase in insurance prices and a change of doctor didn’t put us on the brink of WWIII. Additionally, you have misstated the cause or reason for an increase in insurance prices and the need or requirement to change your doctor. It boils down to the ACA was not going to let you have VW insurance at Cadillac prices and you would have to go to a ‘certified’ repair shop and not a shade tree mechanic. That is about as simple as I can explain it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.