GOP outcry after vote on articles of impeachment delayed

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler paused his committee's debate on articles of impeachment before final votes until the following morning, prompting howls of protest from Republicans after a session that had stretched more than 14 hours. #CNN #News

66 comments

  1. I know I said WTF when I kept seeing it live all day and night, caught most of it. But yea, the public needs to see this unfold, needs to also hear the facts, I get this…

    1. @Mayk3_ME What court order has Donald Trump not complied with? He disagrees with Congress’ ridiculous thousands of subpoenas and the court would rule on their validity if Congress chose to take the matter to court, but they know Donald Trump would win in court so they did not take the matter to court.

    2. @Darrell Brown F you little punk don’t try to speak for us people of color. I’m a proud American African 58 year old retired US Army veteran you clown you’re the racist the Democrats are racist I’ve lived through racism Punk.

    3. Darrell Brown you pulling the race card only makes your point less valid……pity such foolishness……..I’m sure that is your excuse for everything, while being ignorant enough to support the actual party who the KKK and hitler was based on……

    4. Darrell Brown you are seriously a joke, the more I read your comments, the more I see you are focused on one thing….being racist, while calling whites racist

    1. Ikr!
      And they’re the ones calling their opposition “butthurt”, “snowflakes”, and in need of a safe space. Like how the tables have turned lol.

    1. @Lizard King FLUSHING that PATHETIC blue wave down the toilet happening ALL OVER AMERICA at least 15 times a day. Bless yo heart🀣
      YOU GONE🀣

    2. That shows there rotten intent right there, they didn’t want Trump and many do, they are literally saying they will undo the will of the majority, as a citizen and dont see a problem, your brain washed, and are a part of the problem. Kangaroo is too light a word

    1. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU AND ALL VOTERS YOU KNOW ARE FULLY AWARE THAT ANY VOTE THAT IS NOT FOR THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE *IS* GOING TO END UP AS A VOTE FOR TRUMP.

      I made that mistake in 2016 and voted for Johnson because I didn’t and still don’t like Hillary, but at least she was tolerable and no where near the liability to the US that Trump is and has been. Given the last 3 years, imagine how out-of-control he will be during a 2nd term when he doesn’t have to think about a re-election — he’ll be intolerable and even more dangerous. Congress will need to pass a bill that makes it impossible for the president to make any decisions without Congressional approval.

      Republicans would do better for their party if they removed Trump and Pence (or have Pence agree not to run again) and nominated a new Republican candidate all together. From the 2016 election, Republicans have shown they’ll vote for anyone they nominate, and Independents who currently support Trump are never going to vote for a Democrat in 2020. If Rep Senators vote to remove Trump, they’d gain the respect of Independents who dislike Trump and would never vote for a congressman who supported Trump’s behavior. Given that we know Republicans are party before country, I truly think they’re playing this all wrong! If they vote to remove him, they would still not lose registered Republican votes; They’d gain the respect and votes of the many anyone-but-trump Independents, and it’s independent voters that both sides need to win; AND they wouldn’t have to wake up each morning wondering & worrying about what he did overnight or tweeted at 4am nor *constantly* come up with new, far-fetched ideas to defend Trump –and literally no one has been able to reign him in over the last 3 years and his behavior has gotten progressively worse, there will definitely be even more defending him if he has a 2nd term. Why Republicans aren’t seizing this opportunity to remove and replace him while they can still “save face” is puzzling to me!

    1. @thesinaclwonyou have no idea what you’re talking about. I am not Catholic.I am a hunter though and if you’ve ever seen a wild animal caught in trap and another animal comes to eat it while it’s still in the trap and alive. You should see a group of lions eating on the backside of a buffalo while it’s still screaming.

    2. @Nile Wilkie dude it’s 8 in the morning, let people get a couple cups of coffee in them before you start saying stuff like that LOL

    3. @Auntie Em, that was a funny comment. I’ve been up for a few hours already.
      Good morning and go enjoy the coffee.

  2. I love the fake petulance that geeky Foghorn Leghorn showed all day. TEN AYEH-UHM?? I SAY I SAY DEENT EVEN AYUSK UHSSS?!? I’m glad they’re voting when the sun is shining on their cowardice.

  3. These comments πŸ™„ He literally said it’s late, it’s been a long day, let’s think about this and come back tomorrow when our heads are clear..I understand people may have stuff to do tomorrow, but the issue at hand is…more pressing??

    1. @Cropper Copper …not finding that video interesting ? Not even in the least ? I find it very interesting and telling.

    2. @Cropper Copper see it’s tough for me to take these same democrat politicians that were against impeachment in 1998 even after Bill Clinton lied under oath got caught and even admitted he himself that he lied under oath. And now are all for impeachment with farrrrrr less factual evidence against Trump then there was against Clinton when they were against impeachment. Oh but they keep saying this impeachment has nothing to do with politics or hate and they are saddened by it. Come on now….its laughable. If they are against it in 1998 when it’s a democrat president even when he admits he committed a crime and lied under oath….but now are for impeachment without that same kind of factual evidence against a Republican president then what else is it ?? It’s partisan politics and hate…plain and simple any way you slice it. So they are lying when they say otherwise.

    3. @Cropper Copper ….even you have to admit …that video lowers the credibility of Pelosi, Nadler and Waters to say the least lol.

    4. @Cropper Copper so HOW DID TRUMP PRESSURE UKRAIN AGAIN??
      President Z SAID NO PRESSURE..NO QUID PRO QUO.
      YERMOUK SAID..NO PREASURE..NO QUID PRO QUO…THEY WERE ON THE FUCKING CALL…
      SO THAT BLOWS YOUR ARGUMENT TO PEICES BABE. TO ADD OBSTRUCTION TO HIGH CRIMES
      YOU NEED TO PROVE A CRIME..THIER IS NONE..THE POTENTIAL VICTOM..SAYS NO PRESSURE…NO QPQ.
      SO HOW IS THAT PRESSERING…NOT LIKE TRUMP WAS GOING TO HAVE HIM FIRED IN 5 HOURS BEFORE HE LEFT…OH YEAH
      THAT WAS JOE BIDEN

    1. @Beautiful Surprise hi. Firstly, his name has been on tv on several shows and secondly…you obviously don’t know what the word outed means.

    2. @Ani Mal hi. Firstly, anyone who read my comment should have been able to determine, specifically after reading the information in the parentheses, that I have full command of the meaning of “outed.” One of my mistakes is not having seen every program that ever aired on television to know that his name has been mentioned on television before because I’ve watched a lot of TV and haven’t seen it so I didn’t realize his name made it to TV. My other mistake was assuming that people would be intelligent enough to read my comment and know that I understand what “outed” means, again after qualifying my comment with the information in the parentheses. I’ve always been told that assuming is wrong. Guess I’ll never learn πŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™€οΈ.

    1. @Conky Bubbles what about the Democratic building were talking about? What did they try and slip in those and what bills did they try and slip things into?

    2. @Nile Wilkie I know. Which is why all you’re saying is that you have confirmation bias. All of this is documented and most of it has been televised for over a month now. You haven’t seen any evidence and you think that means there isn’t any instead of you’re not trying to find any.

    3. @Cropper Copper I have see some of the live videos, some fox and some CNN. The Dems have hearsay From hearsay, nothing more. That is never evidence in court and it’s bs. They have been talking about this since he was elected.

    1. @Razzle Dazzle
      Yeah!
      Maybe they have to meet their mistresses ….
      Seriously?

      What’s more important then what they’re doing now?

    2. Do you people have no idea how schedules work or something this serious? This is 40 congresspeople who have commitments, it isn’t professional to mandate a schedule change for 40 congressmembers on the spot at 11pm the night before. And the delay isn’t introducing any new facts, which is what Republicans have asked for. Remember the judiciary didn’t hear a single witness with any information, only opinions.

    1. Tell that to #CrookedDonald, aka DonTheCon, aka #TheDon who never works except to enrich himself and his fellow corporate #RichFreeloaders.

    2. Dave S enrich himself????? Hmmmmm, did Obama do such a thing??? I mean, how did he serve 8 years making less then 500k a year, and leave with 14 million???? Funny how all of a sudden everything trump does is such a problem, but all good from 08 to 16 πŸ€”

    1. Yeah we all cant be as smart as johnson from georgia .you know the 1 that thinks guam might capsize youtube it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.