David Laufman, a former Justice Department counterintelligence chief who investigated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's possession of classified documents, reacts to more than 30 subpoenas issued to people in former President Donald Trump's orbit and the former president's ongoing fight against the DOJ over the appointment of a special master to oversee the agency's Mar-a-Lago investigation. #CNN #News
62 comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Recent Post
- Dominica: World Creole Music Festival Road Show in 2023
- Style experts spot a ‘no-no’ inside the Oval Office
- Amanpour: Dissent about war in Ukraine in Putin’s circle is ‘silenced’
- Cannes Film Festival 2023: The stand-out films and stars this year
- Anti-Putin Russians based in Ukraine allegedly stage incursion into Russia
“A president is not a king and the plaintiff is not the president.” – 11/09/2021 D.C. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan
I remember that statement. It still remains as powerful today, as it did when she stated it.
Remember when liberals distrusted government?
I miss those days
“The position the former president is taking is completely untethered to law”
… and the sky is blue.
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
@Bon Goaie
Mr.Richard Head you are out of touch !
Vote blue π
Trump and Pence get invitations, attendance optional, everyone else gets a subpoena. American justice.
@Charles L Jones So what did Trump actually say, ” All I need to do”, or “All you need to do”
@Kelli R. can you say … I pledge the 5th? I was told trump use it 430 times… hum… anyone wants to make a bet ? 10 to 1 odds … I got Venmo?
@Kelli R. SUBPOENA is not criminal .. they need someone to squeal so they can collect evidence… I’m laughing as I type … ha ha
wonder why no one is suing the laptop from hell movie ? it should be worth millions alone?
Muddy the waters,confuse the Judge, which considering she’s a trump appointment and has already made her bias known with her first ruling wont be hard.
@Tony Bryant Do you really believe the garbage you post or are you one of those who can’t stand silence and just have to fill it with noise ?
Sheβs had the job for a couple of weeks and suddenly sheβs the best to judge this national crisis?
get rid of corrupt judges.
Start with the SCOTUS.
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
DJT was back in DC today and at his golf course, but not playing golf. Just walking around with a dozen gangster-types apparently conducting “business”. He’s in such deep do-do, and as the walls close in, he’ll be increasingly desperate to find ways to avoid the slammer. Should be interesting to watch.
*Yawn* We’ll see.
@Aesop531 when Aesop Rock came out with his song “Kirby”, he wasn’t talking about “George Kirby”, he was talking about his cat. #FunFacts
@Robert Draper Sean played a long list on Fox of all the crimes that Trump has had public scrutiny over.
He should have played it slower.
Will the sheet for brains judge ask the lawyers, “did or did not Trump de-classify the docs”? If yes, then we all want to see them. We also want to know what is the daily fine for the overdue library books?
@Gary ahhh. Eat more Curry for the poo to come out in a hurry π π€ͺ.. Good day to you π π
The overdue fine for these library books is life imprisonment.
It’s not a classified document fight. He was caught with stolen classified documents.
@Rider 38 ok traitor
@Rider 38 a lying old man who paints himself orange ON PURPOSE. Could fool you son. Lol have a seat.
@Syyner 2 comments?
Wow you’re SUPER triggered π€£π€£π€£
Must’ve been the groomer comment that pissed you off so much π
BULL GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT, YOUR STARTING TO SOUND LIKE CNN.
@Heather11268 I had a TS clearance in the military. A corrupt judge does not change law. You will see. No one has a right to take gov docs home no matter what classification. An ex president does not have a need to know without permission. By the way go shout at someone that you can scare. Semper fi.
Why they donβt want to testify? Because they know they are criminals.
That’s like saying that Jeffrey Dahmer’s crime was merely a storage issue. Get our secret military documents back!! and throw this criminal traitor in a cell for the rest of his life.
@SKEMT yea that’s a bunch of bs. Lmfao
@SKEMT lmfao! You have totally gone coo koo! ππππ
Thereβs no need for a special master because all seized documents are evidence of criminal activity where the very act of commingling private documents with TOP SECRET/SCI documents outside a SCIF is a violation of 18 USC Β§ 793(f). The accused thief of the classified documents has no rights to now claim the proprietary interest in otherwise private docs because they prove illegal unauthorized access to classified docs in an unsecure facility after the docs were stolen. Moreover, each document has forensic evidence of who may have unlawfully accessed the TS/SCI docs and whether trump and his attorneys obstructed justice. A special master would only delay justice and contaminate the forensic evidence.
@Lea Garner It’s embarrassing for him to not be held accountable. He continues to make this country weaker in the eyes of the world.
@John DiGiacomo Trump has declassified all the documents prior to taking them home. Nothing to see here.
@CynJ Williams the point of the special master is to delay the court proceedings until Trump will enjoy immunity again. Let’s hope that this ploy will work. Its an act o f genius.
I truly hope republicans will not regain the house so J6 can continue unobstructed π
Laufman was excellent, focused and clear and I would love to see more of him on this channel.
Yeah..a clear Thinker and straight Talker.
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
The DEFENDANT already got to appoint the judge in this case.
That “judge” has already committed #ObstructionOfJustice on the #DEFENDANT’S behalf
I think the Prosecutors should be able to pick the #SpecialMaster which is in #NoWay justifiable.
There must be a very limited number of people with the security clearance and qualifications to be considered. I would expect that the DOJ would have to supply the examiner.
@John DiGiacomo ‘There must be a very limited number of people with the security clearance and qualifications to be considered. I would expect that the DOJ would have to supply the examiner.’ A couple of days ago, they already agreed to a Special Master from President Trump’s picks; the judge just has to agree to what both parties agreed to or chose her own.
CynJ Williams, at this point the judge herself is on shaky ground. Her initial ruling was considered to be poorly researched and had no real legal grounds.
No this is simple Theft and unlawful possession. Trying to deny, Defy and distract to delay is not going to help them. The time to own your actions train has left the station.
You know, when I rob a bank* and have my loot at home, that’s just a storage issue, right?
No?
*Note that the contents of said bank are probably not an issue of national security.
He is untethered to reality. And that is an understatement!
This. Further, he’s never been held accountable for anything; so he just keeps the delusions going.
Last fight https://youtu.be/7Gf6-IgljyE
It comes with the office, look at current leadership.
Document storage dispute? That’s like Bonnie & Clyde arguing that the money they stole from the bank was just as safe stored in their basement. They still STOLE it. OMG his attorneys are sorely lacking in the intelligence department. DELAY, DELAY, DELAY.
“A range of issues that they are going after”
There are SO MANY CRIMES to choose from!
1 pssthpok Fuk what you saying it here π https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8sjT-d0x3M
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. π
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados π π
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world πΉππ
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
A vast and extensive “Buffet of Crime”, if you will! Plenty for everyone!
@Randi Bagley-Goodwin LOL! A virtual cornucopia of corruption!
I want to see Trump take the stand and answer questions just like Hilary did, broadcast on national tv in prime time for everyone to see. π
@Tootsla 125 you know she was found guilty of doing it, but not charged because comey said he couldn’t prove if she did it knowingly
@Gulliver the Gullible You are gullible if you actually believe that. Please explain how? I’ll wait.
@Jarrod Clay Yes, that was a Civil case, about his business frauds.
“So many bigly stolen documents.So beautiful. So beautiful.”
Those judges should be removed.