This week the Department of Justice will present which portions of the Mar-a-Lago search affidavit it thinks should be redacted and why. Some of former President Donald Trump's allies have pushed for the release of documents, but the DOJ says it has concerns that unredacted documents could compromise its investigation. Donald Ayer, former deputy attorney general under President George H.W. Bush joins New Day to discuss. #CNN #News
65 comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Recent Post
- Dominica: World Creole Music Festival Road Show in 2023
- Style experts spot a ‘no-no’ inside the Oval Office
- Amanpour: Dissent about war in Ukraine in Putin’s circle is ‘silenced’
- Cannes Film Festival 2023: The stand-out films and stars this year
- Anti-Putin Russians based in Ukraine allegedly stage incursion into Russia
You can call a person who pleads the 5th over 440 times in just one deposition many things, but you can’t call them innocent. 🤣🤣
@R Torres Not in a civil case. Try harder.
It will be a big black page with a heading on it.
Its wrong to allow the affidavit be seen, until charges are made, if any are. 🇺🇲
@Jeannie Smith yes, my bad, thank you
@My Name You can use any new big term you just learned but it doesn’t make it true………..
@My Name You do?
@Jeannie Smith “Probable Cause” is a broad undefinable term that means “Fishing For Anything”…….
@Doris Sanchez That’s ok. You’re a Demonrats,we don’t expect you to know much.
If death threats have been made to the FBI, what do you think will happen to the witnesses🤔
Just appoint a Bill Barr who publicly states ‘I’ve read the affidavit and just trust me it’s all okay’. I was under the impression Merrick said ‘without fear OR FAVOR’! So stop doing the dirtbag favors! 😠
How and why would Bill Barr be able to read it
“From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” Matthew 4:17
“Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” Matthew 5:38-39:
Sorry I ain’t the type to roll over and play dead 🙂
Reminder. 2 weeks since raid, and no charges. 1 week since the demand for affidavit.
@Autry Jr. McGowens This makes no sense……
No charges doesnt mean nothing is coming from the investigation. These things take time, and yes, many of us feel impatient but those who want the law to be done right dont want the DOJ to be biased and jump the gun.
no they’re not. DoJ is under No Obligation
to “show ” you anything..unless they’re Charging YOU…period.
So they can just raid people and not charge them with any crimes?
@NPC #1337 Are you noticing a pattern here?
I love that Lindsay Graham, a Law Maker, can bend the LAW so that he has more time to squirm.
Last fight https://youtu.be/tqy1HnDQ-wU
That’s what he does best. Vote him out when his time is up.
They wouldn’t be in a ‘hard place’ had this country a functioning justice system, one that didn’t pander to the rich & famous.
Indict Trump!
Like Hillary Clinton? Good point.
*I HAVE BETTER CONTENT THAN CNN AND NOBODY CAN OPPOSE THIS FACT.*
@Don Hilland do it yourself
The case’s security is the most important thing. Garland should not to bow to Trump’s challenges, demands, or threats.
If he feels a need to do release info, he should do as Barr did with Mueller’s report: Redact almost EVERYthing.
… And then explain AGAIN, that the case’s security would otherwise be compromised … And keep working on the case instead of allowing Trumpers to be “the tail wagging the dog.”
@Merril R BTW, it was USA Today and NY Times that initially made the assertion of Trump having a policy of ‘America First.’ Do you know anything at all? Maybe go learn something before you start spouting your scatological analysis at others.
@P Money Are you part of the old “Bund Society” 🤔 obviously you don’t know how to read or you’d know what I say is FACT not fiction
@P Money I’ll do the search for you… Wikipedia:
The America First Committee (AFC) was the foremost United States isolationist pressure group against American entry into World War II.[1][2] Launched in September 1940, it surpassed 800,000 members in 450 chapters at its peak.[3] The AFC principally supported isolationism for its own sake, and its coalition included many Midwesterners, Republicans, conservatives, socialists, students, and leading industrialists, but it was controversial for the anti-Semitic and pro-fascist views of some of its most prominent speakers, leaders, and members.[4][5][6] The AFC was dissolved on December 11, 1941, four days after the attack on Pearl Harbor brought the United States into the war.
This makes no sense at all, they never show any information until someone gets arrested, they clearly show it in the warrant of what they are looking into.
Not to mention “they” would’ve arrested anyone else already. This is a travesty.
@Bombastic Enterprise Travesty is , WHAT exactly is cause for any arrest ? Including, what EXACTLY, were FBI agents looking for ?
@Gary Gagnon They never show any information until someone gets arrested.
Alright then, I’m all in for releasing the affidavit … and put the handcuffs on Trump at the same time 😆
I would like to know that if these documents were so special to have the FBI involved, why did it take a year for them to go get them.
@Marvin Guigar Fox News, NY Post, WSJ
they were government property willingly witheld from the government with no indication that they would ever be turned over. Lets say therefore the officials in charge of the record keeping then make a plea with the DOJ, they explain this is a violation of law and government. The DOJ agrees, They get a judge to agree, and thus the warrant is signed over for the FBI to go into Maralago which the FBI proceded to do, they recovered the documents. I dont see what it hard to understand.
Just let the indictments roll and then we’ll know what’s in the affidavit 😃
@DOESCOLDER no you don’t and I reported your page.
If that was happening it would’ve happened already but they’ve been sending Trump to jail for a decade now which is why they look so stupid now
And if no indictment comes?
Disclosure would crush the demoncrats.
Judge never should have suggested he would release anything – it’s just more special treatment – against the concept that no one is above the law – and why we should care what people think about whether someone should be investigated or prosecuted is absolutely absurd. The law is the law – the only time public opinion should matter is if or when DOJ declines to do its job – and lets people off – not when they are enforcing laws – in which case, Jury Nullification is how the public speaks on the matter.
Maybe the judge should have thought before he signed the search warrant
@DwayneShaw1 Between Biden & Putin there both the same in Americans eyes, FJB
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”- George Orwell
Yeah, and?
@Scorpogee Yes. The truth.
“Any time you can tape record a fart, you should.” – J.R. “Bob” Dobbs
“Truth comes but we can’t hear it, how can we hear it, when we been programmed to fear it.”
1 Elaine Queens Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxYhxZVo-3o
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
The Judge understands
the sensitive nature of the Affidavit. The information will come out in any trial so why the rush to
Fiasco by the Judge.
1 JAMES JAMESDAVIS Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxYhxZVo-3o
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
If anyone had stolen ts sci docs and lied about having them, then found to have them, they’d be in jail awaiting prosecution!
@Sean McCartney president ps don’t break laws, other than Nixon. I refuse to use the word “president” to describe Mr. Trump
What if that person destroys all the evidences such as bleaching the server or taking a hammer to their phones?
Miss Lindsey has so much to say, right up until it needs to be under oath.
🤡
@Richard Maher you’re right, public office is way worse to make money off of, private citizens can make money however they want.
@P Money yeah barely, he’s a grifter who’s on the cusp of being broke until his next grift. He sure hit the jackpot with you guys tho, he’ll never be broke again thanks to right wing donations. I hope y’all keep donating every dime you have to him, that’ll prevent any real candidate from having a shot and we’ll keep office for a long time 😁
@Ed He literally had billions in cash
When you’re in a difficult situation, that might be a good time to stick to policy & procedure.
1 clocksurfer Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AdydHAD9n8
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
couldn’t have said it best. Someone should tell that to the judge. He’s probably creating technicalities 45’s lawyers won’t hessitate to use in the future and blame the judge for it.