MPs discuss their reactions to Katie Telford's testimony, and if David Johnston can be objective as special rapporteur.
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:
Connect with CTV News:
For the latest news visit:
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:
CTV News on Facebook:
CTV News on TikTok:
CTV News on Twitter:
CTV News on Instagram:
CTV News on Reddit:
—
CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.
A public inquiry is required regardless, and no, David Johnson, no matter his qualifications, cannot be considered ‘objective’.
What in his career has made you think he can’t be objective?
@ryan radcliffehe is a close friend of the Trudeau family and he was on the board of administration of the Trudeau foundation. That’s why.
No should be public. She did not answer the questions
Trudeau promise ah ah ah 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 what a joke
NO!!! Trudeau haz flat out liex to evsfyne, just like he did at the EA inquiry. Time cor chargez.
A joke, not a single answer from Telford, she just thumbed her nsat Canadians.
specail rapporture is a joke, he has a long history with Prime Minister, plenty of candidates for the role have none of this, choosing this person does not pass the smell test, processes exist for looking into this already, it is called a public inquiry
Telford must have the world’s worst memory….she couldn’t remember or refused to answer a single question.
It solidifies the need for a public inquiry. She answered nothing and clearly provided conflicting information (given by trudeau). She is insisting Johnston will handle it all. Johnstons job is to figure out how to go forward and make sure this happens again. The inquiry is to find out what happened in the past few elections, who knew what, who benefitted, who interfered and why wasn’t anything done.
Joyce Napier, are you a member of the Liberal Party? You do not seem to be independent
Public inquiry is needed. The
only thing Telford did today was confirm why Canadians should not trust the current government.
A respectable PM would instantly allow for a public inquiry or quietly resign. And the excuse, it could harm national security is laughable when considering, a proper inquiry could actually uncover a willful breech of that very thing by politicians.
What an absolute clown show.
How would a public inquiry make any difference. They will not answer any questions any where
That was a joke,,
. It is ridiculous that Canada’s security and international alignment should be dependent on the words and opinions of these Trudeau servants. We need a public inquiry !!
Lol she said twentytwentythird
Nu we been a Public Investigation, he is too close to JT & definitely biased, as we won’t get the truth.