Chief justice admonishes discourse during impeachment trial

Following remarks by impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and White House counsel Pat Cipollone, Chief Justice John Roberts warned both teams about using rhetoric inappropriate for an impeachment trial in the Senate chamber. #CNN #News

84 comments

    1. @MetalDetroit first as in the first and only president who met more than once with the ivans in the oval and we found out from whom? Yeah, the ivans told us bc drumpfffff did not let our media in. You support this you chicken traitor.

    2. @keith2092 and I got no respect for some twat like yourself that wants nothing but America to be a failure. With a statement such as yours I can immagine you had nothing but shivers up your leg everything the Welfare King spoke and drug this country down further. I’ll tell you another thing if this is a traitor that puts America first, and the Americans that live here, I’ll support this “traitor” every day of my poorly educated life. Anything else? Then go about whining in mommy’s basement.

    1. ra5928 Wait ???? You’re worried about the debt ?! Where were you when it went up 10 Trillion in 8 years under Obama ? More than all other Presidents COMBINED

    2. ra5928 Yes – and I can spend all day listing outstanding business news. Like US steel investing 1 Billion in the US, something that hasn’t happened since the 60’s. The Dow hitting 29,000 for the first time ever, real wages up for the first time in decades. A favorable trade deal with China. Apple returning almost 300 Billion to the US economy. Etc etc.

  1. Politically, I disagree with much of Roberts’ politics, yet I highly appreciate Justice Roberts’ insisting upon civil discourse in the Senate Chambers.

    1. Yes Yes, by all means, let’s worry about saving the window dressing, while the whole house is burning-down! Holy, Cow. You’re an idiot.

    2. Yes, praise Roberts who let the partisan sham show and mockery of justice take place — but under the guise of civility. What a fine gentleman.

    3. @Jess Davis If you think Roberts doesn’t know that he’s a republican ruling in a highly partisan climate, you’re either naive or stupid. Maybe both.

    4. @Artistry Artistry Thank you for the ad hominem, good sir. You assume I haven’t done my homework and know Chief Roberts, while certainly of conservative leanings, has also been around well before the Trump days and has treated his job more seriously than most of the clownshow in office today. He has ruled in favor of more liberal causes (as a matter of fact, during the height of the caucus trial, he ruled that while it’s not illegal under census laws, the current administration’s attempt to put in a citizenship question aimed specifically at immigrants could be reviewed and stated their reasons for doing so was insufficient, AKA corrupt at worst) several times. But yes, I’m an idiot for doing basic research.

    1. The globalist left we’re just trying to save their skin at this point. They already lost the impeachment. They are biding their time

  2. As a lawyer once told me never ever put someone on stand that you dont know exactly what they’re going say

    1. @Brad Dibble you already investigated Trump for 4 years. The most vetted president in the history of the country.

    2. @Randy Smith
      Not actually vetted because I haven’t seen the facts of his Russian ties come out yet, and believe me they are there Deutsche Bank and all the money that trumps got from Russia.

    3. @Brad Dibble Bwahahahah. You are fucking pitiful. Ask Rachel Maddow how that bullshit story is working out for her.

  3. How can this be called a ‘trial’ when a trial is all about calling witnesses and showing evidence? Let’s just start calling it something else because ‘trial’ it is not!

    1. Eric Daniel Again – it defies logic. Republicans did not because me democrats. Democrats did not become Republicans. It never happened

    1. @Bill Bailey @Bill Bailey  go back to russia you communist kgb-loving nazi and take your pencil-d1ck with you, incel

    2. @Bill Bailey I think when she’s covered in cum from 6 black men…and licks it up and smiles…… does that show good character on drumpfs part? You blame me for assasination? I think you lost,because it was your campaign money that was supposedly “hushing” her…🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    1. @Eric Larsen :Obama never attempted to govern as a dictator or king. Therefore he had no “reign”.
      He served two terms quite honorably.

    2. Bruce Cumming you didn’t watch cause you wouldn’t be able to keep up with it. You know with you being a moron and all.

    1. Eric Larsen totally. I say all of the time that Trump is a result of Obama. Trump would have never even won the primary if Obama didn’t preceded him. Liberals deny that. I don’t get, how they can’t see that.

    1. @Bird of Prey He actually lost the popular vote by 3,000,000. And Putin got to the GOP to pressure the 317 republicans Electoral College voters. So no, he didn’t beat the despicable Hilary, he had the election bought for him.

    2. @Bird of Prey You’ve been smoking way too much crack
      If you think that agent orange
      trump is gonna be reelected
      😂😂

    3. @Cody Williams Just my opinion, we’ll just have to wait and see. He doesn’t really have any competition so far.

    1. Just think, a part of their salary comes from some who work two jobs for up to 16 hrs at the archaic Federal Minimum Wage that Kaptain Kangaroo McConnell refuses to allow a vote on increasing.

    2. @Moe Snert In simplistic propaganda yes, just remember all ships lift on a rising tide. And these are the people that put the wages INTO the economy, not hide money in off shore accouts or invest in foreign businesses.

    3. Geo78 they’re putting wages into offshore accounts like you said. Raising minimum wage hurts small business that can’t afford it like big businesses can

    1. montetank tankkiller – you wrote “It’s a trial like in North Korea…. a joke” –

      Was the joke that you wrote “Its a trial like North Korea” and you were being brilliantly ironic and uniquely mocking the fact that some are actually stating moronic things like that with a straight face, whilst awesomely having fun and trolling the expected responses that wouldn’t realise this and so attack you in defence of what the senate is doing?

      Or were you being serious with your comparison and describing the trial as a joke like it would be in North Korea?

      If it is the second option, no need to respond, because I already know you’re a moron. If it’s the first…. Top drawer play on the written word linguistics and emotions

  4. It’s sad to see the democracy of the land of the so called free be governed by men who talk with such a dishonest tongue.

    1. @af dadE Somebody please school this inbred Trumptard pleb. Listen you low iq degenerate, Trump and his team where given numerous opportunities to present their own witnesses and testimony. But they denied, delfected, and ignored all subpoenas and requests. Keep guzzling that Orange Kool-Aid, and promoting the worst POS Potus this country has ever had. #3

    2. @af dadE your reptilian party claims that facts are not facts, I understand your confusion. You’re being played.

    3. @Ivanka speads for Quincy Jones 🤣🤣 says the same leftist Democrat cultist fan of CNN who literally just settled with the Covington kids for lying.

      Great irony sweetie.

    4. @The Sleeper Factory sorry bud I’m not the party of brother fucker ilhan Omar that would be you. But it’s cute that your mind goes straight to incest seeing how sick your demonrat party is.

      Just please at least give your 12 year old sister a head start running away from you before you do your left wing Democrat epstein thing on her.

  5. The self-described “world’s greatest deliberative body”. An independent body free of partisan politics and conflicts of interest alright

    1. then the House should’ve had some real witnesses – that’s what they are supposed to do – the Senate is supposed to try the case based on the evidence presented to them by the House – blame the Democrat majority House for forwarding such a weak case to the Senate – maybe they’ll do better on their 2nd impeachment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.