The legal argument over Brexit continues. Judges will decide if MPs should get a say on when the UK leaves the EU. Watch live on day two of the Government's appeal at the Supreme Court.
SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more videos:
Follow us on Twitter: and
Like us on Facebook:
For more content go to and download our apps:
iPad
iPhone
Android
Style experts spot a ‘no-no’ inside the Oval Office
Amanpour: Dissent about war in Ukraine in Putin’s circle is ‘silenced’
Cannes Film Festival 2023: The stand-out films and stars this year
Anti-Putin Russians based in Ukraine allegedly stage incursion into Russia
thanks for upload sky
Legal mumbo-jumbo jumbo that is fine for lawyers to climax over. However,
the public have voted for Brexit and that means 50 must be used to do it.
Any other talk is academic, just what they are doing now bless them.
I think these ppl need to be careful with their stalling. If there is an
early election called UKIP can easly use this to win power. With the
massive turn out for the referendum and anger that a democratic vote is
being undermined by the elite who don’t seem to grasp that it is because of
this sort of nonsence that we voted to leave, Any party that promised to
enact article 50 would win outright.
Practically every executive of democratic states has a prerogative power
that it uses to make and break treaties which is then ratified by their
elected chambers. This hair splitting legal balderdash has one purpose and
that is frustrating, delaying, complicating the triggering of article 50.
It shows up the criminal intentions of the unelected elites to thwart the
democratic will of the majority. It won’t work.