Bill Barr, the former Attorney General to President Trump, says that the Department of Justice is getting very close to indicting Trump over his handling of classified documents. #CNN #News
Bill Barr says the DOJ is getting very close to indicting Trump
he’s worried what kind of precedent is set if a former President is indicted for illegal activities, shouldn’t we be more concerned on the precedent not to do so? I thought America had rule of law ……….
@M Hall even if he is not indicted, preventing him from running for office ever again would be good enough for me
Agree, not pressing charges is a far worse precedent
Australia is well recognised as punching above its weight internationally, and for being a positive force on a wide range of issues. Unfortunately, the ridicule and opprobrium the Morrison government brought upon the country has damaged that standing, but there is great appetite to see Australia back in the game and on the right side of history.
Indicting a former President who has broken the law is VITAL if we are to be truly a nation of laws rather than an autocracy or other lawless entity. If you say that no one is above the law, then it must be proven by holding a former president accountable. It is a must for our democracy.
@BeHuman I noticed it happen with other accounts as well, In “Google chats” in Youtube windows, there are some there as well, but with those I found they actually have hundreds nearly identical account names, takes about 3 days to get them all, banned in Chat, but diff nick. This CNN bug might be in their servers.. But YES it is annoying ..
@Renee Elliott No you’re not. You know he’s guilty too.
@Thomas Voloshen and George bush???
“The three of us would have been indicted by now… well, at least I would.”
Vino you guys good 😊 your good 😊 love 💕
#Bars 🔥
The brother knew without a doubt he would be locked up.😂😂
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
Trump for Prison 2024!!!!!!! 👏 👏 Lock him up!!!!! ♥️🇺🇲
Not 👏🏼👏🏼Gonna 👏🏼👏🏼happen👏🏼👏🏼
Trump for Prison 2022
🇺🇸trump 20-24 years in prison l🇺🇸
So where is the line on what a president/ex-president can do before they are accountable in the eyes of the law. If reckless disregard for the national security isn’t it, what is?
@Raysha no they haven’t. But Ford pardoned Nixon before he could be indicted
@Rennie Christian Patience grasshopper and stay tuned.
@P L
Lol, that is the only thing required of all of us, “patience” we’ll know that justice was adhered too in the fullest extent of the law.
Stay well PL
Well if you use Joe Biden as an example, there are no laws.
Careful what you wish for , any harm done to another in spite always returns in the form of despair, until one breaks free of the darkness that misled them.
It is critical that no individual be insulated from accountability simply because they are a national political figure, a former president, or a candidate for public office. Choosing not to pursue accountability for fear of the political criticism or consequences is itself a deeply political act.
@hjwswswws hj no no, in this system, only one side is held accountable. Not both. Lol
Bla bla , you’ll be arguing the opposite when it happens to your guy.
Typical Barr: “Technically” he can be indicted. But he does not want him to be indicted. What? Nobody is above the law, Mr. Barr!
@Frank N. Stein Of course it is. Some people just don’t like it.
@Nick Nack Paddy Whack You Ain’t Black Jack That is nonsense.
@brother andrew
I HEAR YA!!
he said in 2016 while campaigning, “in my administration, I’m going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. NO ONE will be ABOVE THE LAW.” ooops! NO ONE means you too!
@Chucks Grace Actually nuclear information is classified by law as an act of congress and is outside the presidents power to declassify. I would also point out that mere possession of those documents, classified or not, is illegal.
@Immudzen Based on unknown sources. Lol
@j3scott Prove it!
@Chucks Grace LOL all the MSM could talk about were unknown sources when reporting the Dossier and you ate it up.
The perspective from a citizen; damage to our country will occur if DOJ does not indict if DJT broke the law. DJT has damaged our democracy and he needs to be held accountable . Any other citizen would be held accountable and rightly so.
For what though? What did he do wrong?
@clark2293 that must’ve been one helluva heavy rock you’ve been sleeping under the past 6 years.
You mispelled DOJ
Nah just give him immunity like Hillary. Then allow him to testify to congress.
You don’t want to see him indicted because you protected him for years while he did this stuff.
What did he do? Lol like what’s the charge
“Pardon him” … hell NO … Oh hell NO …. Lock him up
No more pardons for anyone
They do the crime they do the time plain and simple.
Agree 💯! Where are the consequences of they’re just going to pardon the bastard? You or I would not be pardoned! They take away the whole deterrent if that is done!
Taking top secret SCI documents out of a secure location is a little bit more than a overdue library book
@Chucks Grace stolen property
@Chucks Grace concerning statutory guidelines shouldn’t we consult Matt gates?
@Chucks Grace The president does not have the power to declassify nuclear information. That is classified by law and outside of his powers.
If the evidence is there, indict anyone who warrants it.
That’s it. The D.O.J. needs to do its job.
Exactly
@Steve Wilson including him, if 5he evidence exists. And it appears they have the evidence to indicate trump
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
Smoke and mirrors people. Its a nothing burger.
Presidents should have the highest level of integrity and be reprimanded when they are corrupt.
@KIDD SIG13 trumputin was Russias president
@Criminal n Chief we ran out of baby formula for the love of God.. rolling blackouts in california.. democrat ran
“I don’t want to see him indicted”
Then, close your eyes, Bill.
Because it’s coming.
An hum real loud while it’s happening.
Soon in prison
@Dustin Barlow but orange man evil
He ABSOLUTELY MUST be indicted. If NO ONE is above the law, it’s imperative he’s indicted, found guilty (he categorically is) and sent to prison. Secret Service protection be damned.
It’s amazing that US politics are defined on where one stands on Trump, and the degree of agreeance or disagreeance with him.
“The three of us would be indicted by now.” Truer words were never spoken.
Justice is blind unless you’re a politician, rich, white or Trump.
@SLED leohja You could have just left it at Politician.
Last fight https://youtu.be/dpoFCCQYllw
“do you indict a former president?” how can this really be a question given the overwhelming information about his conduct both seen and heard. and that’s just of what we know !