Mick Mulvaney, who worked as President Trump's chief of staff, discusses the bombshell testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson and Trump's role in the January 6 insurrection. #CNN #News
48 comments
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Recent Post
- Dominica: World Creole Music Festival Road Show in 2023
- Style experts spot a ‘no-no’ inside the Oval Office
- Amanpour: Dissent about war in Ukraine in Putin’s circle is ‘silenced’
- Cannes Film Festival 2023: The stand-out films and stars this year
- Anti-Putin Russians based in Ukraine allegedly stage incursion into Russia
Hutchinson, “The sky is falling!”
Meadows, “Meh.”
@w kahn Ok. Can you remind me how that investigation went? Wasn’t it nowhere?
@w kahn Yeah, just like that one guy that got acquitted?
Last fight https://youtu.be/3RVEXAp6PuU
Call it “jumping ship” but Mulvaney going on CNN and acting surprised about Trump’s actions is like a bank robber walking away from a foiled robbery attempt and claiming he didn’t know about the crime, he was just taking his gun for a walk!
taking his gun for a walk lol!!!!! great fun thanks scotty bob made me laugh!!!
@pim telman Yes but ask him the most important question. If a sharp and formidable Dem ran against Trump in 2024 who would he vote for? Bill Barr already gave his answer.
@starless mystery Because they actual believe that he is their messiah. To them it would be devastating to find out that he’s being prepared for the crucifixion. He on the other hand believes that he is invincible.
@locadisa a lot of trump people resigned that day or almost immediately after
She testified under oath. Have these folks who have disagreements with her testimony come in and testify to the contrary under oath, not at some news agency, but under oath. 🤷🏽♂️
It was hearsay, not admissible in a real court.
Can someone answer this for me? Was her video answers under oath? Liz would ask her a question, then play the videos for her answer. Was that a get away w/ lying under oath loophole?
Is hearsay also a lying loophole? Just Curious. Thx!
We The People MUST DEMAND that those who planned, committed, were accomplices to, were complicit in, and obstructed the investigation into, these crimes (ALL of them) are held accountable. We The People MUST DEMAND that the rule of law be upheld and enforced, or these unethical, immoral, shameless, self-serving, greed driven, scumbags be voted out, or thrown out, of their ELECTED and APPOINTED offices for failure, or refusal, to do their jobs and represent their constituencies, the American people. There MUST BE consequences for ALL who were involved, not just those who stormed the United States capital building.
Well said Metal…
0:59 “I never even thought, until yesterday, that he was even capable of inciting the riot”…. 🤨… yea… right…. 😏
1 Chris B Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Hhttps://youtu.be/d8vd5eJaepA
FINALLY!!!😃✌🏻here is finally!
Mulvany suddenly getting a conscience… funniest effing thing I’ve heard all day. 😂🙄
Ask them all the same question as Michael Flynn under oath, “Do you believe in the peaceful transition of power?”
General Flynn took the 5th on that very question. Says it all.
Why are you giving Mick air time? He is trying to rehab his image. Remember, you know he said Trump did quid pro quos all the time. Why hasn’t he ever gone to the justice department and spilled the beans about all the criminal behavior he witnessed and was involved in?
1 Brittany Miller Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
“I never believed until evidence started being displayed, well you’re darned tootin’ I’m gonna say I believe he’s guilty now.” All these clowns are just trying to preserve their own butts now. Call it the Michael Cohen effect.
I’m having a hard time lauding any of the former enablers of 45 now coming out of the woodwork and “offering their insight”, and yet clearly still omitting the pertinent parts, just vying for a talking-head position at the roundtable on some mainstream news outlet. Everybody working around him knew how off his nut 45 was in the White House, how much of a spoiled, irresponsibly incompetent toddler, and yet they all twiddled thumbs and turned blind eyes for a little bit of power and a little bit of name recognition and a little bit of cash…
Not just a little bit of cash. Being in the WhiteHouse was ABOUT pulling in the cash
Amazing how all these “men” heard nothing, saw nothing and did nothing! Thank goodness for the character, moral compass and bravery of this very young lady. It ts about time that all these “good people” stepped up to the plate.
Just a word to the secret service, you also swore an oath when you took your job! There is no executive privilege for you. Perjury can mean imprisonment!
Absolutely
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
I’m getting a self-serving vibe from Mick: “Things really disintegrated after I left.” As Barr would say, what bullshit.
G f y
@sissy murphy I THINK YOU NEED A GOOD THERAPIST
A fair hearing isn’t defined by “both sides” coming out, but rather by the TRUTH coming forward.
Exactly. The Trump loyalists have been and still are invited to testify. They are choosing not to which results in their not having their side on the record and part of the conversation. This is NOT a trial. This is a hearing. You participate or not. That is up to you.
@Ann Marie Heck in the “House of Representatives”, GOP Representatives didn’t EVEN to be on the January 6th committee. They had a CHANCE there!!!!! SO Liz Cheney & Adam Kinzinger stepped up!!!!
Last fight https://youtu.be/pq9yyaZ25YI
Good luck with that. I’m keeping my powder dry.
@Ed Cox So true and honest !!
As trump has said himself MANY times “if they plead the 5th they are guilty”.
1 deb yager Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
“If there’s witness tampering, that’s serious. This is the first time we’re hearing about it.”
You mean, aside from the tweets he sent DURING HIS IMPEACHMENT?!
This shouldn’t be a shock to anyone.
“I’ve never seen donald trump throw a plate before.”
I’ve never seen a president get impeached twice- but he did it. Wild.
1 Nick Feder Fuk what you saying it here 😠 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zrfSK6pnpQ
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
I believe if he’s capable of starting an insurrection; He attacked his driver and threw his food up against the wall, I think he did everything that Ms. Hutchison said that he did
Babies throw tantrums.
“A perfect phone call”. Did Mulvaney say: “We do that all the time…” He shouldn’t be given a platform.
As a person with long years of experience in reading body language, I can tell you with confidence that Cassidy is indeed telling the truth. But the question is what she was told by the sources who initially told her the story. It is possible that in the excitement of the moment, the secret service agents may have exaggerated the events in the car. But that is not the fault of Cassidy in telling what she heard. The most significant part of the story is that Trump was unhappy about not being able to go the U.S. Capitol with the rest of the mob…!!!..So, the details of how Trump expressed his displeasure in the car, has little to do with the big picture that he wanted to join the mob, something that has never been disputed by the secret service agents.
Exactly!!! Don’t focus just on a little tid bit of information, but look at the overall picture that is not in dispute.