76 comments

    3. @Pancho Villa yes they are, i see you’re the only wise man who is a decent human being here and the wisest, the others are very pathetic, let me rephrase them…Tom Hall

      Reply

    1. @Clown Shoes MMA Because normal people don’t need to make those distinctions. That’s not what egalitarianism and democracy is about. Logic and reason, not tribalistic instincts. And what are you talking about the word “fag” for? You’re not really connecting anything here. Help me understand where you’re coming from.

      Reply

    2. @AllShaaaallPerish I literally have no idea what you’re talking about. If you wanna rearrange that paragraph to take an actual stance on an issue, we could engage in some civil discourse, cousin.

      Reply

    5. Dylan Ontiberoz just watch the news. If a white male says the wrong word (such as fag) you’ll have every talk show and news show talking about it for weeks. I see it every day. But other races get away with being racist assholes and nothing is said. I’m not even white and it offends me. If another race commits a horrible crime you may hear about it but then it’s buried , it’s not drug out for weeks and weeks.

      Reply

    1. @Melvin Gillham I’m sorry I must be misinformed as the state I live in is highly liberal and you can’t even own a drum for a bb gun, but what doesent make sense still is the shooting ofcourse. Its an obvious cover up attempt and the reasoning behind that is the sound of the gun is that of an m240b and his brother was arrested shortly after for 1tb of child porn on windows 98

      Reply

    2. @iWillbe yes I’m opposed, it removes my freedom. I cant condone that in any way. You can be a good little sheeple and “submit” to “masters” if you like. We are free. And will remain so.. ask the Brits what happened at Concorde. They tried to take our guns too. I dont agree on anything you’ve said. Nice try, no cookie. 🤣😂

      Reply

    1. @Briteone6988
      All this really happened too. Like the southern dixiecrats creating the KKK and today You fucksticks pin it on Us!! Or Republicans voting to free slaves and u DEMS voting to keep them slaves. The truth is below..
      There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were six from 1840 through 1860.There is no reference to the number of Democratic presidents who owned slaves. There were seven from 1800 through 1861There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms that either supported segregation outright or were silent on the subject. There were 20, from 1868 through 1948.There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC’s missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the “whites only” front section of a bus, the “whites only” designation the direct result of Democrats.There is no reference to the formation of the Ku Klux Klan, which, according to Columbia University historian Eric Foner, became “a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party.” Nor is there reference to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease’s description of the Klan as the “terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.”There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.There is no reference to the fact that Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Lincoln’s ticket in 1864. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.There is no reference to the Democrats’ opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1875. It was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by President Ulysses Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.There is no reference to the Democrats’ 1904 platform, which devotes a section to “Sectional and Racial Agitation,” claiming the GOP’s protests against segregation and the denial of voting rights to blacks sought to “revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country,” which in turn “means confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed.”There is no reference to four Democratic platforms, 1908-20, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically address “Rights of the Negro” (1908), oppose lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks “wards of the state.”There is no reference to the Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.” The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright. To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000 hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans and Catholics.There is no reference to the fact that it was Democrats who segregated the federal government, at the direction of President Woodrow Wilson upon taking office in 1913. There is a reference to the fact that President Harry Truman integrated the military after World War II.There is reference to the fact that Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Wilson’s New Freedom and FDR’s New Deal. There is no mention that these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks. Neither is there a reference to the thousands of local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen and U.S. senators who were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965. Nor is there reference to the deal with the devil that left segregation and lynching as a way of life in return for election support for three post-Civil War Democratic presidents, Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.There is no reference that three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House came from Democrats, or that 80% of the “nay” vote in the Senate came from Democrats. Certainly there is no reference to the fact that the opposition included future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Vice President Al Gore.Last but certainly not least, there is no reference to the fact that Birmingham, Ala., Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor, who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil rights protestors, was in fact–yes indeed–a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.

      Reply

    5. @the Annuity Slayer Diversity is a cultural marxist activist tactic used right before Communism is fully implemented. As long as you have “actors” in every branch of every system to control like puppets. For example 🕎 created the “N.A.A.C.P” why would 🕎’s create an organization for black people? Take 1965 civil rights movement led by Dr. Martin Luther king. Again who was arm locked with him during the Selma Marches “🕎” again. Nelson Mandela who surrounded him “🕎”. Who took over Russia and turned it into a Communist Bolshevik Solviet Union “🕎”. Who were the KGB that tortured Russians they were mostly “🕎 born in Russia because Russians didn’t want to torture their own people. Who were the communists that “H” kicked out of “G” “🕎” lol Who is 2% of the US population but yet is impeaching President Trump 🕎. They even brag about it in the “Times of Israel” All of the minorities and little groups are just pawns of the 🕎bolsheviks. The New World order is about enslaving the world under Zion. People can laugh but they are so powerful that even saying they are powerful puts you in prison in the EU. No matter what party you choose the result is the same. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kZTf3NG7DI

      Reply

    3. @scott smith Would you rather die quickly by a bullet or slowly by an Islamic style knifing in London called “bagging” where they shove the knife so far up your rectum you will be using a bag for the rest of your life to relieve yourself. Guns are protection from tyranny don’t let these rich who control the media, commercials, and your mind by using emotional propaganda get you to give up your peace and safety. Guns save more lives than they take every year. Plus when you remove guns only the most vile, wicked, men who are already criminals will have them. Guns are to protect good people from those who wish to do you and your family harm. If you don’t want to use them that is your choice but don’t take that choice away from another good person who has never committed a crime.

      Reply

    4. @Callentay their is no such thing as an assault rifle just fyi it’s a armelite rifle model 15 which is kinda like fords modular engine the receiver can be used with many parts the military use this style and add parts which make it a carbine. Civilians cant buy the same parts so civilians cant own legal full auto ar 15s or carbines.

      Reply

    4. That’s called good journalism, making a whole day about the attacker is a reward for them, just another incentive to crazy.

      Reply

    1. Yes hats off to those brave men. In this day and age of an attack on masculinity. Thank God they were two real men on that bridge. And not a bunch of skinny pants wearing soy boys. And I guarantee every strong independent woman ran for her life.

      Reply

    2. @Cate D’Arpino diversity isn’t hated but it just a fact that it causes division. Live in a preschool sandpit dreaming ‘imagine’ if you can’t handle basic factual criticism that has noting to do with racism. A country has roots, a past and a foundation that sustains it – if you don’t like that like I said be a delusional hippie sitting in a sandpit. Very childish.

      Reply

    5. funnie how no one cares whenever a white boy shoots up a place but whenever once in blue moon a Islamic man does it everyone attacks us? racist much? pathetic cowards

      Reply

    1. Yeah load them into a giant cannon and fire them all the way back to Syria. Doesn’t matter that only about 4% of them are Syrian, they ALL goin to Syria anyways.

      Reply

    4. Surin attack? The technological level drops … Next attack with a flint of Palaeolithic flint with Rahan son of Crao screaming “Allah ouakbar!” ?

      It’s a good thing that these dudes handled by the services have IQs of 50, because if not imagine a little what could do determined men willing to sacrifice their lives if they had a minimum of planning ability, a sense of war strategy … our politicans would be “prout” and move in papamobile!

      It’s crystal clear … especially that its waiters would attack some elite ..

      As Soral would say, these attacks are always directed against the small people, the passers-by of the street, never against the leaders who bear the true responsibility of our disastrous policies, from there to ask themselves questions conspiracy

      Reply

    1. Should have never had to, the government has blood on their hands.
      Disarming your civilian population and flooding them with 3rd world militants is treason.

      Reply

    2. @cj p This is England mate. We aren’t allowed guns because if we had them the only person who would be alive after 6 months is a 73 year old lady called Ethel from Scunthorpe.k

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.