Rep. Clark On Investigation: If We Will Hear Further Testimony Is ‘Undecided’ | MTP Daily | MSNBC

Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) joins MTP Daily to discuss the impeachment inquiry, what steps the House will take next, and John Bolton’s Twitter tease. Aired on 11/22/19.
» Subscribe to MSNBC:

MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.

Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com:
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter:
Find MSNBC on Facebook:
Follow MSNBC on Twitter:
Follow MSNBC on Instagram:

Rep. Clark On Investigation: If We Will Hear Further Testimony Is ‘Undecided’ | MTP Daily | MSNBC

41 comments

  1. Golly, maybe electing a known pu**y grabbing conman with a long history of racism and lying wasn’t such a great idea after all. Who wooda thunk?

    1. Yeah. Doesn’t he know that in America you don’t defend people that you don’t like? Especially if you can’t prove that they have actually done anything wrong.

  2. Faux told viewers “there’s nothing to see here.” The people that need to hear and see this, refuse to. IDK what else we can do…..

  3. Nixon’s articles went far and wide beyond Watergate, digging into _everything_ that Nixon did wrong. This should, too.

    And even if the 2/3rds Senate vote for immediate removal and conviction is not possible, the simple Senate majority vote to _disqualify_ the Trump administration from another term is not

    1. You’re right. We should look into everything that this president has ever done wrong in his life. And then we should do it for the next president. And the next. Why waste our time waiting for a crime to emerge before we investigate it when we can just look at people’s lives until we find something that we can call a crime.

      And why stop at presidents? When can we start on you? I’m sure you have never done anything wrong. Why wait for evidence of an actual crime to emerge that leads to you when we can just start with you until we find a crime?

  4. We will get the truth when all the Presidents men testify!! I believe this will not happen, but if he’s impeached and not removed from office, then as an American I plan to Vote Him out!!!

  5. Bolton wants his book read first! Do the right thing Bolton your book sales are not what Americans need from you right now, your truth is more important than that!!

  6. Bolton needs to step up to the level of these patriots who worked for him. Come forth for your country Mr. Bolton, the time is now

    1. No. He just needs to be caught. But, just like innocent people, first, you have to show evidence of a crime to be caught doing. And if you don’t have any…

      …oh wait… i know… assume he’s guilty anyway. Because… because…

      Well, I don’t have to tell you because, that’s why!

    2. @Iron E : What planet have you been off to? He was caught. Everybody saw it. There is a ton of evidence. No republican has disputed that he extorted an ally for personal game.

    3. @adamf663 That’s your evidence? “He was caught. Everybody saw it. There is a ton of evidence.”? OK. Is that how it works? Fine. Here’s my evidence. “You were caught. Everybody saw it. You tried to frame the President for it.” That’s pretty powerful stuff. And according to your own standard, hard evidence.

      You see, the thing is this. I have looked for this evidence that I keep hearing about. I also hear democrats yelling about it. But I don’t see anyone actually producing it.

      Oh, sure, they say things that sound damning. They also make charges that they are sure should be punishable. But they tend to ignore that the things they say are either distortions, accusations based on emotion rather than fact of charges that are not actually illegal.

      And here we are.

      So, when people, like myself, ask for this so-called evidence, rather than being presented with it we get maligned, insulted and told that the evidence is right in front of us.

      I know what it would be like to be someone defending a person at the Salem witch trials. Where I would be in danger of receiving the same treatment just for asking questions.

      And that’s all I’m doing. Because I care about truth. If someone could show me the actual evidence that merits either prosecution or impeachment, I would agree with them.

      I am not unconvinced because I cannot be convinced. Can you admit that you might be wrong? Or will you just accuse me of being incapable of it? Because it has been my experience that people see in others the things that they are afraid to see in themselves.

      So tell me. Honestly.

      He was caught. By whom? Caught doing what? What is the evidence that proves it?
      Everybody saw it. Then why is it so hard to find witnesses who will say that they saw it? It should be easy if EVERYBODY saw it.
      There is a ton of evidence. Where is it? I’ve seen lots of stuff that people call evidence. But evidence is not just what you think proves something, or what you can make sound like something. Evidence is what proves something. Show me that.

  7. If the book deal is more important to Bolton than his oath of office than I suggest No One should buy the book. Hit him where it will hurt the most..boycot the book & publisher

    1. Except that he has not been charged and there is no evidence. But I guess that doesn’t matter to some people. The ‘TRUTH’ is always what you want to be true and not what the evidence actually leads to.

      And you know how I know I’m right? Because whenever I see people make comments like yours, they are always ambiguous. They never include actual evidence to support them. All they are is people yelling for what they want to believe is true. But if it were true, you wouldn’t need to just spout your opinion. You could just lay out the evidence.

      If you could, I’d agree with you. But you just saw a woman saying “we have to keep looking until we get the truth.” after getting all the evidence that says there is nothing to look for. The funny thing is that you could take anyone and put them on trial and ‘keep looking’ until you find something about them that might be criminal. But here the thing about that.

      1. That’s not how we do a criminal investigation. You don’t imagine the crime and then try to find the evidence for it, nor do you just look for the evidence of a crime until you find one. First, you establish that there is indeed a crime, and then you look for the evidence. That is not what they have done here.
      2. Even with all the in-depth searching, they can’t find any evidence that Trump is guilty of ANYTHING. But that doesn’t stop people from saying he is guilty of EVERYTHING. If Trump were really as bad as people want him to be, you would find evidence of crimes all over the place. You’d be tripping on them. But you can’t find one. All you have are people saying they know he is guilty because they heard someone say he is guilty because they know he is guilty because they heard from someone that he is guilty because they know he is guilty. And for some reason that convinces some people.

      I only hope people like you who support this kind of investigation find yourself on the receiving end of it. that someone accuses you of a crime that they have no evidence for and then ‘keeps looking until the get to the truth’ until they find something about it, or anything else, to indict you. Then we’ll see if you think it is still a good idea. Especially if everybody is screaming that you are guilty while you look on in horror at your situation. And anyone who supports you is maligned and called a Nazi and/or intimidated and beaten.

      I thought Americans were supposed to be better than that. But, I guess I was wrong.

    2. @Decody G The world is an oblate spheroid. See that is the difference between facts and narrative. Something you should look into before you make a fool of yourself while thinking that you’re making a witty recounter.

  8. Bolton is a warmonger, Bolton thinks everyone willbuy his book! Money over country, party over country, Republicons M.O.

  9. Donald Trump = the biggest mistake politics has ever seen in the history of the United States.

    Now time to correct it in 2020.

    1. Absolutely the biggest mistake in our history. He says that he’s the best in our history, but in reality he’s the dumbest.

    2. Biggest mistake?

      A President who has given them the best economy, lowest unemployment, better security and efforts to stop foreign wars, bring troops back home, end racism and homophobia across the globe, ending insurance and drug companies from bankrupting people and investing in black communities.

      I think they could use more mistakes of that nature, don’t you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.